Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Pre\-Distortion\s+Linearizer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Pre\-Distortion\s+Linearizer\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Pre-Distortion Linearizer (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 21:42:30 -0700; On 5/5/2013 4:19 AM, peter chadwick wrote: Manufacturers have gone mad about IMD in receivers but can you use it? e.g. a +40dBm TOIP with a 10dB NF. In SSB, that's an rx noise floor of -130dBm and an; /archives//html/Amps/2013-05/msg00107.html (13,543 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Pre-Distortion Linearizer (score: 1): Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 04:44:09 +0000; I have not read all of this thread, a lot said and I just not on computer much these days. However, a mulit-op contest station would benefit from a receivers and transmitters with low IMD as well as; /archives//html/Amps/2013-05/msg00108.html (15,071 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Pre-Distortion Linearizer (score: 1): Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 04:49:26 +0000; The last great subsidy in manufacturing and electronics industry was the 1960's space race. I expect we will never see another like it. 73 Bill wa4lav _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2013-05/msg00109.html (8,244 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]