Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Question\:\s+Ship\s+Vacuum\s+Variables\s+at\s+minimum\s+or\s+maximum\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Getting set to sell off some vacuum variables and I have a question: when I ship them, should I set them at minimum capacity setting or at maximum capacity? I would think the answer is to ship with t
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00040.html (7,135 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:21:17 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: That's a very good question Robert, but I think the best way is to pack them so well it doesn't matter. I'm not trying to be a smarty here, it's just that they are so delicat
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00043.html (8,091 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: "Pete Lancashire" <pete@petelancashire.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:35:52 -0700
I would toss in, neither. If anything go to fully min or max and then back off a couple of turns. Also consider buying a double or triple wall corrugated box, if I was the buyer I would be glad to pa
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00044.html (8,290 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Eban" <alexeban@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:06:05 +0300
--Original Message-- From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:21 PM To: Robert Groh Cc: amps@contesting.com Sub
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00046.html (9,192 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Bob, Per the Jennings catalog, vacuum variables should be shipped at min. C. 73 & Good afternoon, Marv WC6W http://wc6w.50webs.com/ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00047.html (8,709 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: "James R Carr" <n7fcf@hctc.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:44:53 -0700
The sure way to beat the united gorillas is to pack it like a fishing pole. A short length of pvc tubing of the right diameter with a couple of end cap caps fastened on with sheet metal screws. pad i
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00063.html (10,077 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
That sound's like a good idea with one added proviso - the cap inside has to be kept isolated (as much as possible) from shocks and vibration. But I do like the idea of the rigid (yet fairly inexpens
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00065.html (11,242 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:43:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: That is true, but vacuum variables are most easily damaged by impact, not crushing. I had one which was sitting on its end on a table. While working on something, I just bare
/archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00072.html (8,978 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu