Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RE\:\s+\[Amps\]\s+8877\s+Max\s+Grid\s+Current\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RE\:\s+\[Amps\]\s+8877\s+Max\s+Grid\s+Current\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] RE: [Amps] 8877 Max Grid Current (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:47:36 +0200; A brand new and optimal 8877 (years ago, rarely later) was typically 40- 50mA for 1.8Kw of output power at VHF (broadcast) with 4Kv HV (loaded). As the tube was aging, the RF power decreased and driv; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00140.html (9,102 bytes)
2. [Amps] RE: [Amps] 8877 Max Grid Current (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:57:54 -0700; In my 8877 homebrew amps, I've always found that with high enough Ep and heavy loading, I could produce "legal limit" output with very little grid current, typ. 50mA. Lower Ep, more Ig. Looser loadin; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00141.html (10,508 bytes)
3. [Amps] RE: [Amps] 8877 Max Grid Current (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:51:25 -0700; Indeed. Less anode-V means that more electrons flow through the grid. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00144.html (7,431 bytes)
4. [Amps] RE: [Amps] 8877 Max Grid Current (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:40:46 -0500; Since the original question was VHF related, take my observations for what they may be worth. I was charged with testing 33- 8877's, with date codes from late '70's to early "90's. I used an RF gener; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00145.html (8,634 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]