Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RE\s+\:\s+who\s+needs\s+it\?\s+Henry\s+8K\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:50:37 +0100
" YAR " Translated Yet An other Religeon.....! Curious how one would react when overtaken by a F1 or a CANAM on there regular highway......? For some people the rules are made to tell us how far one
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00248.html (9,507 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:51:43 -0400
Jos, I'm glad I never started this thread or I'm sure it would have been stopped just after it started, with a threat of removing me from the list over complaining about the FCC again. It does bring
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00252.html (11,235 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "PA3DUV" <pa3duv@planet.nl>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:13:39 +0200
We do not know Will. The output power steps were 3 db up, so it could be anything between 8 and 16 kW 3 dB steps were chosen due to the advice of very experienced members of this forum who say that
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00254.html (11,930 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:24:40 -0400
Dick, I'm glad you ran the poll. I wish you had of added the higher power just for grins too. I'm all for folks having an amp, and have been guilty of running over the legal limit a good bit myself.
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00255.html (15,250 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:46:09 -0700
Did you intend this e-mail to go to a public list? Dino - K6RIX dino@k6rix.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00280.html (10,983 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:32:14 -0400
Well sure, the truth is the truth isn't it? I don't have anything to do with it now and haven't for some time, but for others to understand what really is happening, might as well tell it all. I pers
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00281.html (12,349 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:03:15 -0400
Eddy, There was a big scam uncovered and it was in the Washington Post about the auctions. Minorites could get first dibs on this and could buy the blocks at a way better price than a large coporatio
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00284.html (16,061 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "S. J. Blackwell" <w5lu@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:50:12 -0500
An honest person is one who obeys the law when no one is looking. Anarchy would occur if no one obeyed the law except when in public view (if they still were affected by public scorn, a real if) or w
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00285.html (13,267 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:31:57 -0600
Some thing to consider...how many do not ever drive above the posted speed limit? Is the law absolute or is there some 'wiggle room'? For example our two lane paved highway posted speed limit is 100
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00286.html (9,378 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:49:49 -0400
Sam, I believe every licensed amateur deserves to own and operate an amplifier as the law grants it. The problem you have with the FCC not providing the oversight it once did is folks start slipping
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00287.html (15,888 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:14:48 -0700
Doug -- When I was occasionally running the Plywood Box 20db amplifier on 40m, and I was answering questions about it over the air, the FCC received a number of letters about me from complainants. Th
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00288.html (10,271 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:38:24 -0500
Rich-- This sounds like a cheap shot to me. I have been contesting since 1959 and have operated at many multi-multi stations as well as some single-op stations and I have yet to see any CONTEST stati
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00292.html (9,678 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:31:15 -0500
John, My experience with top contest stations is similar to yours. Someone posted earlier about a percentage spread of hams using various amounts of power from QRP to illegal levels of QRO. The perce
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00293.html (10,675 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:05:12 -0400
Keith, John, and the rest of the amps list, My experience in an aggregate total of over 30 years of contesting is the same as yours. Just as in other endeavours, there's no sense of accomplishment in
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00294.html (13,470 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "jgroover6@concast.net" <jgroover6@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:07:46 -0400
Have any of you guys ever heard the legend of "Gator Stakes" and the FCC's "Targeted Cities List"? There was some Serious power being run on 75 then.-Jim KB4RMN ______________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00296.html (8,970 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:35:49 -0600
So now you have started a list of stations that claim to not exceed the legal limit. Continue to add to the list. At the same time why not start another list of stations that claim to exceed the lega
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00309.html (10,428 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:50:29 -0700
Those who run Serious power on a regular basis are not serious about keeping their license, waste electricity, and they are nuts. R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734 r@somis.org ________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00313.html (9,409 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:56:54 -0700
... and they never, ever drive faster than 65.00 mph on the Interstates. ... R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734 r@somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contes
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00314.html (9,643 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 04:03:40 -0700
It happened, John. R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734 r@somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00315.html (10,429 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:08:39 -0500
Rich-- I am not saying it didn't happen. What I AM saying is that your comment makes it sound like contesters running tubes with handles is rampant among the contest fraternity. And what I am saying
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00316.html (11,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu