Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RX\s+protection\s+scheme\,\s+is\s+this\s+sound\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RX\s+protection\s+scheme\,\s+is\s+this\s+sound\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] RX protection scheme, is this sound? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chriswilson.tv>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:52:31 +0100; 12/09/2018 11:42 RX protection sought for either a Kenwood TS-590 or a Red Pitaya functioning as an SDR for the LF 136kHz band. Change over relay box for the antenna has a 60 Amp automotive relay gro; /archives//html/Amps/2018-09/msg00011.html (7,397 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] RX protection scheme, is this sound? (score: 1): Author: Steve <g8gsq72@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:43:30 +0100; I think I'd go for higher speed diodes. A professional VLF multicoupler I worked on decades ago used a string of 6 or 8 MUR120 diodes back to back. The number was needed because of extremely high sig; /archives//html/Amps/2018-09/msg00012.html (8,481 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] RX protection scheme, is this sound? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chriswilson.tv>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:57:32 +0100; Hello Steve and Chris Hayes, thanks for the replies. I have gone for two ultra fast high power diodes in back to back with a festoon bulb of 5W at 12V in series before them. It was not practical to w; /archives//html/Amps/2018-09/msg00016.html (9,616 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]