Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+FW\:\s+How\s+are\s+IMds\s+created\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+FW\:\s+How\s+are\s+IMds\s+created\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: FW: How are IMds created (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:53:13 -0500; You are referring to models that are determined by empirical data. There you can't separate the effects of second order and third order distortion. The math ( I don't know if you looked at it or not); /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00085.html (16,999 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Re: FW: How are IMds created (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:12:53 -0800; If the IMD products were the mixing of the harmonics, it should be possible to trap them out. Pappenfus et al point out the fallacy of regarding IMDs as being the mixing of the harmonics: it is howev; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00086.html (7,587 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]