Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Relay\s+Contact\s+Bounce\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Relay\s+Contact\s+Bounce\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Relay Contact Bounce (score: 1): Author: nospam4me at juno.com (skipp isaham); Date: Thu Jun 5 08:51:12 2003; True, but in my opinion the bouncing doesn't stop as fast as people are reporting here. I consider the 4mS value more realistic based on my actual measured examples. - skipp - -- Forwarded message --; /archives//html/Amps/2003-06/msg00028.html (7,119 bytes)
2. [Amps] Relay Contact Bounce (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Fri Jun 6 09:12:36 2003; ** I measured the time for complete closure with a Hewlett Packard 1706 o'scope. Rich, AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.vcnet.com/measures; /archives//html/Amps/2003-06/msg00033.html (7,639 bytes)
3. [Amps] Relay Contact Bounce (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick at Zarlink.Com (peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com); Date: Sun Jun 8 08:58:01 2003; Question: for a given relay part number, what sort of production spread could one expect on bounce? (over batches as well as parts within a batch) My suspicion is that it could be very wide, especial; /archives//html/Amps/2003-06/msg00039.html (6,680 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]