Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Resonant\s+choke\s+filter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Resonant\s+choke\s+filter\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 04:30:22 -0400; I had started designing a resonant choke filter for a supply I'm thinking about building and figured I would share the information here. I was looking at using a 5 Henry choke by Hammond Mfg. and nee; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00000.html (7,466 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 01:34:03 -0700; On Jul 31, 2004, at 1:30 AM, Will Matney wrote: I had started designing a resonant choke filter for a supply I'm thinking about building and figured I would share the information here. I was looking; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00004.html (8,990 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 07:48:54 -0700; On Aug 1, 2004, at 2:13 AM, Will Matney wrote: Richard, Yea, I was shooting for the 3X (460Vdc X 3) but in the Allied catalog, there was a jump between 400V and 2 Kv. The X363 series from ASC goes fr; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00006.html (11,502 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 05:13:13 -0400; Richard, Yea, I was shooting for the 3X (460Vdc X 3) but in the Allied catalog, there was a jump between 400V and 2 Kv. The X363 series from ASC goes from 100 to 400 Vdc. Then the next series is the; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00007.html (10,762 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:03:35 +0100; Is actual resonance what you want? The argument I've seen runs as follows; In a choke input supply, there's a critical minimum value of inductance for regulation. At low currents, this is very high,; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00008.html (8,129 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 02:47:31 -0700; On Aug 2, 2004, at 2:03 AM, peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com wrote: Is actual resonance what you want? The argument I've seen runs as follows; In a choke input supply, there's a critical minimum value of i; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00009.html (8,771 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:42:13 -0400; Peter, Yes, there's a minimum inductance which can be figured by L = 0.11 x E / Imin. Imin can be figured from the bleeder resistor or minimum current draw of a device. As long as it is over this val; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00011.html (10,015 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:54:50 -0400; Peter, With looking through the books texts I have here, That is the way you design this filter using a swinging choke. With mine, I needed 400 Vdc @ 80mA maximum. So Lcrit = E / Imax which is 400 /; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00014.html (10,183 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:12:44 -0700; On Aug 2, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Will Matney wrote: Peter, With looking through the books texts I have here, That is the way you design this filter using a swinging choke. With mine, I needed 400 Vdc @ 8; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00018.html (11,346 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 23:49:01 -0400; Rich, I'm running a regulator after the swinging choke for the bench supply. I was wanting to do this to try and clean up the ripple before the regulator had to handle it (plus I have a surplus swing; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00019.html (13,206 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 19:55:13 -0400; Don, I read that about the lam stacking on an audio website and I thought I seen it on Hammonds website also. What it said was the chokes were being supplied interleaved like transformers. I know for; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00026.html (10,365 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:00:10 +0100; Because the critical choke inductance in a choke input filter varies inversely with the current, the swinging choke can have less air gap i.e. less reluctance than a non swinging choke. This means th; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00030.html (11,199 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: Angel Vilaseca <avilaseca@bluewin.ch>; Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 08:29:55 +0200; Hi snip snip What could a wrong resonant condition be? Resonance frequency can be -much too low (what happens then?) -a bit too low just as you just wrote, -slightly too high, which is what we want i; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00035.html (9,558 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Resonant choke filter (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 03:48:13 -0700; n On Aug 4, 2004, at 1:00 AM, peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com wrote: Because the critical choke inductance in a choke input filter varies inversely with the current, the swingin; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00039.html (13,229 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]