- 21. [Amps] Russian Power Tubes (score: 1)
- Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:01:48 -0800
- And thats why im going this route ...I have a Yokagawa P9306UL that i pressed into ameture radio service with only minor issues really. Then one of the 3-500Z (emiac lot from 87) started shorting to
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00377.html (11,154 bytes)
- 22. Re: [Amps] Russian Power Tubes (score: 1)
- Author: texasrf@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:10:04 EST
- A few of the VHF builders have removed part of the GS35B anode cooler to reduce the height. I have no idea how far one can go with this concept but it is mucho larger than an 8877 by comparison. 73,
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00378.html (10,911 bytes)
- 23. Re: [Amps] Russian Power Tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "David H Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:05:38 -0500
- Russian (USSR) specs are not the same as Eimac or other hi-quality manufacturers. There is, for example, not even a published figure on cathode input impedance. That said, stick to your sheet specs a
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00381.html (11,338 bytes)
- 24. Re: [Amps] Russian Power Tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Hoeppe" <thomas.hoeppe@asamnet.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:39:16 +0100
- Hello Dave! sorry, but I can't agree in your explanations. There is strawing for sure! But I would never call it a communistic phenomenon. I use amps with 2x GS35b. It took a while and a number of tu
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00382.html (13,436 bytes)
- 25. Re: [Amps] Russian Power Tubes (score: 1)
- Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:08:56 -0500
- At 2.2 Kg or about 4 3/4# the GS-35B is a tad beefier than the 8877<:-)) and at just a tad over $100-$120 a lot less money. However IIRC they are out of production. Remember the GS-35B can be mounted
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00386.html (12,872 bytes)
- 26. Re: [Amps] Russian Power Tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:48:00 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'm not sure it's fair to say a tetrode circuit is more complicated. True, they require a screen supply, but most tetrodes can be run without an input coupling network and it
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00387.html (8,499 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu