Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-200\s+80\s+Meter\s+Dilemma\s+Update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-200\s+80\s+Meter\s+Dilemma\s+Update\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-200 80 Meter Dilemma Update (score: 1): Author: Ka7lpo@aol.com; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:27:41 EST; Here is an update on my 80 meter dilemma on my SB-200. Originally, I posted that my SB-200 was working great on 40-10 meters but not good on 80. I had a high swr and any noticeable power output above; /archives//html/Amps/2004-03/msg00028.html (7,295 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] SB-200 80 Meter Dilemma Update (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 02:47:09 -0800; ** This suggests that your drivermight be throttling back to protect itself. ** strange but ** No. - I would try a Pi-network 80m tuned-input with a Q of 2. (Xc!=25-ohms) good luck, Don ____________; /archives//html/Amps/2004-03/msg00039.html (7,973 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] SB-200 80 Meter Dilemma Update (score: 1): Author: "carl seyersdahl" <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:36:08 -0500; When it comes to the SB200, or for that matter any other amp, 80 mtrs seems to be a difficult band to get a decent input swr. What is your input swr , more or less exactly, on 80.??? I have had many; /archives//html/Amps/2004-03/msg00049.html (9,682 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] SB-200 80 Meter Dilemma Update (score: 1): Author: "carl seyersdahl" <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:43:39 -0500; What do you mean by "load and tune caps, 100 and 500 pf caps?? the tune cap is about 250 pfs, and the load cap is a dual or triple cap of about 1000 pf or so max. something doesn't look right there.!; /archives//html/Amps/2004-03/msg00050.html (9,328 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]