Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-220\s+Flash\/Bang\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-220\s+Flash\/Bang\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-220 Flash/Bang (score: 1): Author: "Jim Kennedy" <kennedyjp@cableone.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:47:29 -0600; Hi guys, I need some ideas. I have an SB-220 circa early 70s and am the original builder. I converted the amp to 6m about 4 years ago at which time I installed RFP 3-500ZGs. At that time I also insta; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00387.html (8,694 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Flash/Bang (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:21 +0000; Hi Jim, I'm surprised you haven't gotten a bunch of replies already. Sounds to me like a short on the RF deck side of the B+, after the B+ passes through your glitch R. Although I don't quite see why; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00404.html (8,006 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Flash/Bang (score: 1): Author: Tim Kass <k8wbl@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT); Excellent Ideas Rick, I should wait to see what Carl weighs in on, but I will add... remove the tubes before testing...might as well test them as well, but might be a plate short to ground.. caps go; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00408.html (9,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]