Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB220\s+vote\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:26:46 -0700
To add one more opinion, I also feel that the Heath SB220 is a classic, simple yet elegant design, which is timeless. While the green two tone cabinet reflects last century ergonomics, the circuit is
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00070.html (7,462 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:27:10 -0800
** With a stepstart and current-limiting filament transformer, the SB-220 may be switched off and on as often as needed without damage. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing l
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00078.html (7,033 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 08:33:30 -0800
John T. M. Lyles wrote: To add one more opinion, I also feel that the Heath SB220 is a classic, simple yet elegant design, which is timeless. <snip> My hat is off to the hams at former Heath company
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00080.html (7,326 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 03:06:36 -0800
** Vic -- If W8JI designed the SB-1000, then who designed the original Amp Supply AL-80? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00086.html (7,410 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:09:31 -0800
A healthy 3-500Z has lower IMD than today's crop of transceivers, provided that plate/anode current is <420mA. - R.L. Measures/Rich..., AG6K, 805.386.3734, www.somis.org ____________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00095.html (9,026 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:13:52 -0800
** Amen, Vic. ** Agreed, provided that the plate/anode current is pretty much within the mfg's ratings. . - R.L. Measures/Rich..., AG6K, 805.386.3734, www.somis.org _________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00096.html (8,415 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: Steven Grant W4IIV <stevengrant98@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:14:35 -0800 (PST)
does it matter Rich? to me the single 3-500Z amps today are junk. (junque for the higher classes) my data tells me that at 3,000 volts, the max plate current should be 370-400 ma and get 750 watts ou
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00097.html (8,982 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 08:05:04 -0800
R. Measures wrote: ** Vic -- If W8JI designed the SB-1000, then who designed the original Amp Supply AL-80? Rich, I know he is responsible for the Ameritron AL-80, which I believe came out after the
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00099.html (7,812 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 12:33:10 -0800
Steven Grant W4IIV wrote: does it matter Rich? to me the single 3-500Z amps today are junk. (junque for the higher classes) my data tells me that at 3,000 volts, the max plate current should be 370-4
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00100.html (8,037 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 05:41:27 -0800
** Tnx, Mike. If Bruce Alexander designed the original AL 80 for Dennis Had, and the subsequent SB-1000 is a semi-clone, then how could W8JI have done more than make changes to Alexander's design? __
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00104.html (8,598 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 23:31:58 -0800
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00452.html Mike, W4EF.......................... _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00105.html (8,139 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 10:27:10 -0800
Good question, Rich, I don't know, but in the interest of full disclosure, I am not staying awake at night worrying about who designed any ham gear :):) Mike, W4EF................................. or
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00115.html (9,720 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] SB220 vote (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:56:01 -0800
** Nor am I, Mike. However, since the Heath SB-1000 appears to be a semi-clone of the orig. AL-80, methinks that Mr. Alexander should be credited with the design of the SB-1000. cheerz _____________
/archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00125.html (9,595 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu