Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SS\s+amps\s+watercooling\s+\-\s+was\s+PowerGenius\s+XL\s*$/: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:58:47 -0500
Correction, I should have fact-checked myself. Jim is right in that under vapor cooling, water *does* approach 100 degs. C, then converts to steam vapor, then cools through the condenser where it giv
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00132.html (10,478 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Alan Ibbetson <alan@g3xaq.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 22:44:09 +0000
cooling works on the premise that the water is brought up to a boil. And thats with normal sea level pressure. Put the system loop under pressure, and the boiling point will rise by a bunch. Will a
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00133.html (8,653 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:53:47 -0500
1st, they don't use water. As I said in the post, Water, Vapor phase cooling is too hot for SS amps/circuits. 100C will work, but the life of the device would be drastically shortened. Vapor phase co
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00136.html (13,082 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:15:55 -0500
Wouldn't Amps, or Ham Amps be a better reflector for this thread? Were talking distilled water here. If it's conductive enough to present a danger, it's long past time for a replacement. When I was a
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00151.html (12,314 bytes)

25. [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:43:44 -0800
Wouldn't Amps, or Ham Amps be a better reflector for this thread? Were talking distilled water here. If it's conductive enough to present a danger, it's long past time for a replacement. When I was a
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00154.html (12,695 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Ray, W4BYG" <w4byg@att.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:05:27 -0500
FYI: I'm afraid I have to disagree on the statement below about distilled water being conductive. In industrial experiments in the use of distilled water, I found it to be very non-conductive. If I r
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00156.html (14,381 bytes)

27. [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:37:31 -0700
Continuing this thread, we used deionized/deoxygenated water for our RF power tubes at the accelerator plant. I designed the anode cooling tubing to have no more than 500 uA of leakage current per ho
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00157.html (9,152 bytes)

28. [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:22:06 -0800
FYI: I'm afraid I have to disagree on the statement below about distilled water being conductive. In industrial experiments in the use of distilled water, I found it to be very non-conductive. If I r
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00158.html (10,231 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Big Don <bigdon39@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:27:10 -0800
Might run another experiment to see how conductive initially distilled water becomes after spraying it onto the inside of a cabinet, and on some circuit boards. Collect the drainage in a pan, which n
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00159.html (11,363 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:29:29 -0600
Good Point! The Mineral oil or Transformer oil, I wonder what happens to that in varying amounts of contamination? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.id
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00160.html (11,567 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:58:51 -0500
Anything that comes in contact with distilled water is a potential contaminate, including: air, tubing material, metalized heat transfer condensers, couplers, even copper plating on the inside of a t
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00163.html (13,903 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:11:42 +0000
Hi all, It's my humble opinion that this whole thread on how to cool high power solid state amplifiers, using water (or evaporation, oil, freon, whatever) is on the wrong track. Instead of using high
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00165.html (9,907 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:11:08 -0500
Not sure what you are disagreeing with. Distilled water presents a high resistance when first used, BUT, distilled and de-ionized water is ion hungry, or rephrased, quite corrosive. It will take the
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00167.html (17,591 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:33:18 -0600
A lot of klystrons for UHF TV used ion-exchangers ( we called them scrubbers ) to help remove the brass / copper / stainless / whatever ions were present. Don W4DNR Not sure what you are disagreeing
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00168.html (17,940 bytes)

35. [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:26:00 -0800
Hi all, It's my humble opinion that this whole thread on how to cool high power solid state amplifiers, using water (or evaporation, oil, freon, whatever) is on the wrong track. Instead of using high
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00169.html (10,083 bytes)

36. [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:20:15 -0800
Not sure what you are disagreeing with. Distilled water presents a high resistance when first used, BUT, distilled and de-ionized water is ion hungry, or rephrased, quite corrosive. It will take the
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00172.html (10,382 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:48:50 -0500
50 ohms = 1414 V peak. Those type of dummy loads are not an issue. Available up to 200 kw. Recently purchased a NOS 5KW Altronic Omegaline load. Connect a garden hose, crack open a faucet, set reaso
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00174.html (8,941 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:06:24 -0500
water..... without having to go through the boiling process. De-ionized water IS NOT pure water, the de-ionizing process does NOT remove silicates that are abundant is some parts of the world, very
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00175.html (9,127 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 02:06:31 -0500
A properly designed SS amp running Class A, AB1, AB2, B, and C uses about the same power and class as a tube amp may require less cooling than the tube amp as there is no heat from a filament. Many t
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00176.html (12,320 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:44:07 +0000
Jim, Only a few do, on short wave, most of them just outside ham bands. Most broadcasters use AM or FM, of course. I do take your point. High efficiency amplification is trivially simple on FM, and o
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00178.html (13,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu