Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SS\s+vs\.\s+Tubes\s+$was\s+\"I\s+gotta\s+tell\s+this\"$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SS\s+vs\.\s+Tubes\s+$was\s+\"I\s+gotta\s+tell\s+this\"$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SS vs. Tubes (was "I gotta tell this") (score: 1): Author: "Theo Bellamy" <theo.bellamy@spirittelecom.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:13:07 -0500; I really wish I could get excited about building an amp with solid state devices. I know we are not on the cutting edge when we build amps with 813s from WW2 or Russian Tank Radar tubes, but the tran; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00749.html (8,510 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] SS vs. Tubes (was "I gotta tell this") (score: 1): Author: "N7HIY" <N7HIY@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:26:10 -0800; i knew we would get to the core issue sooner rather than later. We are cursed by the non-Intelligent Design of ham radio RF amplifiers. i'll glad that someone spoke up for GOD's requirements for rf a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00751.html (9,388 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] SS vs. Tubes (was "I gotta tell this") (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:39:37 -0800; This gentleman has the soul of a poet. Right on! Bill, W6WRT ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00753.html (9,392 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] SS vs. Tubes (was "I gotta tell this") (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:20:47 -0800; Time to repost the pix of the 3-500z's doing their job. And, quite well I might ad. Who has them? Or were they 4-400'S? At any rate, those were nice pix of RF watts being generated. _________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00766.html (9,603 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] SS vs. Tubes (was "I gotta tell this") (score: 1): Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:48:40 -0800; Everything that you say is true, but given that one wants near-instant band-change, it's much less expensive to match your antennas to less than 2:1 and go solid state (no built-in tuner needed) than; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00781.html (8,632 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]