- 21. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:19:20 -0500
- I am in Florida and used to ship things from my company by ups. I remember when they started this blanket "double box" BS. I can't quite remember when it started but long ago they gave no hassle abou
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00772.html (11,379 bytes)
- 22. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Clements" <philk5pc@tyler.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:03:52 -0600
- As a retired pilot for a major package freight company, I have witnessed many incidents where package damage occurred during the sorting process. This is not a problem unique to one carrier...all fr
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00775.html (10,414 bytes)
- 23. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:30:32 +0000
- They may "guarantee" 5 days, but they failed to deliver in my situation two weeks ago. The 4-pound electronics item I had ordered sat in a Texas FedEx facility for the first day and a half, was on th
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00779.html (9,561 bytes)
- 24. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:06:28 -0800
- At our local UPS shipping facility, the conveyor is 25-feet above a concrete floor. Delicate items should definitely be equipped with an automatic-parachute. And remember, UPS is pronounced "oops". R
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00800.html (11,254 bytes)
- 25. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan" <dpipes@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:49:40 -0700
- You would think that would be the case. I too have firsthand experience. If you pack it your self and THEY determine it was not properly packed they can will and do reject the claim .. does not matte
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00838.html (9,693 bytes)
- 26. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan" <dpipes@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:55:17 -0700
- _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00840.html (9,764 bytes)
- 27. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:03:29 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Dan, It must just be where you all ship from. I know here they are the most accomodating folks around. I've had them to actually take a new box and double box items for me, put in paper packing, re-d
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00842.html (10,735 bytes)
- 28. [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan" <dpipes@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:21:12 -0700
- Will, dunno I guess so but I would think they would have to stay to their own policy. Hard to think they would start a repacking service. Infact I have never been in a UPS terminal that had more then
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00843.html (7,771 bytes)
- 29. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:58:23 -0500
- All, Just remember, it was a UPS Store, Inc., that screwed up the packing of the Alpha 77Sx. This is after UPS, Inc., suggested the shipper to bring the amp to the UPS Store to pack and ship it. Plea
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00845.html (11,075 bytes)
- 30. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:34:20 -0500
- I cannot imagine anyone handing over a 77Dx to the UPS Store for packing & shipment without critically examining and accepting the packing procedure. In such a case, the selling party contributes to
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00846.html (8,938 bytes)
- 31. Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Dennis" <pegasus@mho.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:19:48 -0700 (MST)
- I have shipped somewhere around 3,000 parcels in the last several years. I used to ship with UPS quite a few years ago. In the "old days" UPS would terminate an employee found throwing boxes. You guy
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00855.html (11,211 bytes)
- 32. [Amps] shipping damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Harold Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:22:54 -0400
- This is as old a topic here as was parasitic suppressors. If someone ships something that is not packed well enough to survive a fall out of a window three floors up they deserve to have their stuff
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00356.html (8,474 bytes)
- 33. [Amps] shipping damage (score: 1)
- Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:08:25 -0400
- I have read so many stories here about shipping damage, that I just have to put in my .02 worth. !! We all know that shipping is a very problematic situation !! How many of you out there are willing
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00368.html (6,859 bytes)
- 34. Re: [Amps] shipping damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:56:31 -0400
- One of the major problems is most people don't have any idea how to pack something to make it survive shipping. They think it's all a matter of bubble wrap or newspapers. How would you handle that?
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00369.html (6,844 bytes)
- 35. Re: [Amps] shipping damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:48:34 -0500
- There you go shipping business by ham for hams. For $1000 a day I'll drive any ham gear from any place USA to any other place USA. Guaranteed to get there in one piece. Rattle NOT OK. I'll even do it
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00374.html (8,027 bytes)
- 36. Re: [Amps] shipping damage (score: 1)
- Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:30:22 EDT
- How would you handle that? The first time something poorly packed was damaged the shipper would still get all the blame. 73 Tom I was once told by someone or a shipping company don't remember which,
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00375.html (7,739 bytes)
- 37. Re: [Amps] shipping damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:37:57 -0500
- NO Pack to take a 4 foot drop to its head. A friend bought a 3K Classic X from a California ham. The seller took the amplifier to the loading dock at his business, shipping dock staff was to palletiz
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00376.html (8,267 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu