Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Silver\s+plating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Silver\s+plating\s*$/: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Silver plating (score: 1): Author: EVonvaltie@aol.com (EVonvaltie@aol.com); Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 13:23:33 EDT; While doing a major shop cleanup, I came across an old container of KoolAmp wipe-on silver plating powder. I recalled seeing a note about it recently, recommending it as a protective (?) coating on c; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00128.html (8,175 bytes)
2. [Amps] Silver plating (score: 1): Author: garyschafer@attbi.com (Gary Schafer); Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 16:03:32 -0400; I bought a little electroplating kit a year or so ago (never tried it yet) from a QST add. I think it was Texas platers. They have silver, nickel gold and a little brush that you hook to a battery. K; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00130.html (9,212 bytes)
3. [Amps] Silver plating (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com); Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 18:41:22 EDT; Brush plating is really only meant for fixing small defects in surfaces which have already been plated. Brush plating deposits only a very thin coating of material and really isn't suitable to high p; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00133.html (7,161 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: fredffff@hotmail.com (Fred Fliss); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 06:17:15 EDT; I guess I'm confused. I'm just an engineer. We were taught that Lord Kelvin said that until you can put numbers to it, you don't know a darned thing. So on this silver plating thing, we have one Brit; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00215.html (8,856 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 06:54:16 -0500; <<SNIP >> Not only that, one of the very vocal participants in the game cant even understand that, just because the standard way of measuring resitivity uses a cubic centimeter, the units are NOTohms; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00216.html (9,220 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VA3UX)); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 09:55:53; You're right Bill, but the "units" thing was no more than a red herring. It just detoured the conversation away from the original question - a common occurance here. Phil -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00218.html (9,772 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:22:12 -0700; indeed, Phil. The AMPS group is sort of like a technoblatherer magnet. . I could olfactorily-envision a red herring coming from this particular source well over a year ago. cheers. - Rich..., 805.38; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00219.html (10,507 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@pop.uky.edu (William L. Fuqua III); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:58:40 -0400 (EDT); It seems that silver's conductivity is only 6 to 11 percent better than copper. And the skin depth of silver and copper at 100Mhz is about .00026 inches. So to get the entire 6 to 11 percent improvem; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00220.html (8,330 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:53:22 -0700; ? Copper oxide and copper sulphide are poor conductors. Silver oxide and silver sulphide are not. cheers, Bill - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00221.html (8,351 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 13:43:42 -0700; I was told by a expert from one of the major TV transmitter manufactures that clean copper and clean silver would not show any actual difference in operation at RF. It is when it ages and oxide coats; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00223.html (9,478 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VA3UX)); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:15:13; Wellll Rich, I didn't want to be too direct originally, but I was actually implying that you were the source of the red herring in this particular case. I do agree with you about the magnetic propert; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00226.html (11,803 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 22:53:54 -0500; I'll get you technical reasons. All I have to do is ask. 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden KE9NA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na <-- CHECK IT OUT! It's been updated!!!!! "A life lived in fear is a life half lived.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00231.html (8,177 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:40:56 +0100; I think we have another thread de-railed by the wanna-be scientist debating society. Who gives a shit if silver is better then copper? Or vice versa? In all the years I've been building and scrapping; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00233.html (9,039 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:00:52 -0700; The argument about standard units was the red herring. It was designed to divert attention from the bogus claim that copper is a better conductor.than silver. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00234.html (8,000 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:06:17 -0700; As do I, Larry. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesti; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00236.html (8,584 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Silver Plating (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VE3OZZ)); Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 19:57:20; To all that were interested in the 'how to silver plate' discussion we had here about a month ago, hang-on a little longer. I'm almost finished collecting information. The 'how-to" part is very easy.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00084.html (6,730 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Silver plating (score: 1): Author: f.g.robertson@open.ac.uk (Fraser Robertson); Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 09:27:01 +0000; Hi all, can anyone explain to me why silver plating is used to decrease loses in tank circuits and so on. Looking at the figures there seems to be a very small difference in resistivity and skin dept; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00037.html (7,976 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Silver plating (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 09:13:47 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Two reasons I know of Fraser. 1.) People mistakenly "think" it helps Q at HF and lower VHF. 2.) The plating makes the tank look pretty. Perhaps, but a nice coating of a che; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00040.html (8,876 bytes)
19. [AMPS] silver plating (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 15:13:45 +0100; Tom, Do you not think that the variation is well within the limits of measurement error - thus really proving your point that you can't tell the difference? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00043.html (8,167 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Silver plating (score: 1): Author: f.g.robertson@open.ac.uk (Fraser Robertson); Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 16:11:09 +0000; Thanks for the replies so far. I thought I was missing something somewhere, but it seems not. Mind you, I have to admit, silver plating does look the part! Fraser G4BJM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00044.html (7,822 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]