Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Sunspots\s+gone\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Sunspots\s+gone\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Moody" <bob@vanirmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:22:00 -0700; Where is everybody? Did my e-mail link quit, or is a black hole swallowing all propagation? Tap, tap ......Is this thing on? K7IRK _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Am; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00272.html (6,781 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:22:08 -0400; Bob: Coming in quite clearly in eastern Tennessee - Jim W4ENE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00273.html (7,134 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: david sutton <sootydave@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:52:11 -0700 (PDT); Bob. Loud and clear here. i think that every one has migrated to the antennas group. I sure wish some sun spots would appear, give us all some thing to do then. Dave kg4uxr Brits with a southern ca; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00274.html (8,195 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: mikea <mikea@mikea.ath.cx>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:40:28 -0500; I've seen a fair quantity of Amps list trafic since the beginning of 22 Sep. It's not dead. Sunspots, now ... there are some astrophysicists saying that we won't be seeing sunspots again for a long t; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00275.html (7,300 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: Kevin LaHaie <klahaie@centricata.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:02:56 -0700; Obviously somebody is spending too much time on reflectors, and not enough time on the Solar Propagation Websites If you haven't, check out www.solarcycle24.com - everything (and then some) regarding; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00278.html (8,088 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT); The sad story may be seen here: http://www.solarcycle24.com/ 73 & Good morning, Marv WC6W http://wc6w.50webs.com/ * _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00279.html (7,188 bytes)
7. [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <nz4o@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:19:15 -0400; Check out my web page NZ4O Solar Cycle 24 Forecast Discussion & Archive: http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm . I have a forecast for solar cycle 24 and some discussions on a possible Dalton Minimum; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00280.html (8,723 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:40:42 -0700; Ah, but the sunspot number was 31...that does not translate into 31 sunspots because of the means of calculating the SSN. There's a formula something like adding 10 to the combined number of spots an; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00288.html (9,444 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Sunspots gone? (score: 1): Author: "David H Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:55:55 -0400; I like guts in predictions but in the end it is like reading the tea leaves. The only professional prediction using physics & observed information out there is Piktpati's [sp?] projection of a modera; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00290.html (11,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]