Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Tentec\s+TITAN\s+III\s+vs\s+ALPHA99\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Tentec\s+TITAN\s+III\s+vs\s+ALPHA99\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: <ea1dgz@dxhunters.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:23:48 +0200; Hi all I am EA1DGZ my name is Carlos I am trying to make up my mind for a new amplifier and after searching and reading on the internet and talking to people, I am in between the Alpha99 and the Tent; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00409.html (7,555 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:33:51 -0400; Carlos, Have you taken a look at the new QRO amplifiers? Internally, I actually like them better than either the Ten-Tec or the Alpha. No matter what, all amps fail after a while, and to me the QRO i; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00411.html (9,094 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:42:12 -0400; The 99 is rated at 1500w any mode, no time limit (with external fan option I assume). The TitanIII data says it's only good for 1000W continuous duty..... Probably not an issue unless you do RTTY con; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00412.html (8,409 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:46:49 -0500; At 03:23 PM 10/25/2004, you wrote: Hi all I am EA1DGZ my name is Carlos I am trying to make up my mind for a new amplifier and after searching and reading on the internet and talking to people, I am; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00414.html (9,467 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:03:09 -0400; Hi all I am EA1DGZ my name is Carlos I am trying to make up my mind for a new amplifier and after searching and reading on the internet and talking to people, I am in between the Alpha99 and the Tent; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00415.html (8,277 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:28:40 -0700 (GMT-07:00); The led display of the Alpha 99 is better at displaying the true voice power of the amplifier, since there is no mechanical delay of a meter. Although peak hold circuits can be utilized with meters,; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00417.html (7,551 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Tentec TITAN III vs ALPHA99 (score: 1): Author: Ed Briggs <edbriggs@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:34:27 -0400; The Titan III is rated at 1000w for up to 10 minutes, not continuous. See the owner's manual on their web page. I assume). The TitanIII data says it's only good for 1000W continuous duty..... Probabl; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00418.html (9,367 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]