Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+The\s+maximum\s+amount\s+of\s+811As\s+and\s+572Bs\s+in\s+parallel\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:05:12 +0800
Hi, I have seen some schematic diagram of amplifier, I found that the amount of 811As and 572Bs no more than four, Coud someone can tell me how much maximum amount of the tubes in parallel? Thanks! 7
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00924.html (6,856 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:14:35 +0800
Richard, I see, too much tube means much drive.Myebe I can not use the cathode drive. I have seen a very old Chinese military 1600W HF transmitter(final is FU-100F=4CX1000A) the pre-driver are 8*6P15
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00940.html (8,963 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:37:13 -0500
I have an article using 6 of the 811A's in parallel for 160 meters from 73 Magazine, early 1980's. I would imagine the output capacitance of more than 4 would be too much to tune the plate circuit on
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00959.html (8,176 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:57:45 -0400
Joe, I imagine your right. That's the problem with triodes if you want to parallel them. One needs to go to tetrodes or pentodes for smaller output C. I have built some though for 10 meters that didn
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00962.html (9,846 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:17:30 -0400
The real issue is feedback capacitance, not output capacitance. Amplifiers using two tubes are barely stable on upper HF because feedthrough capacitance is far too high. Four tubes actually require
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00964.html (8,445 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:57:49 -0700
Tektronix used to use c. 10 tubes in their O'scopes' deflection plate amplifiers. The story about paralleling more tubes having too much C is a large pooper scooper of taurine feces because if the #
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00990.html (9,092 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:23:15 -0700
If the number of tubes doubles, RL is divided by two, the amount of Tune-C needed doubles to main the desired Q, so adding more tubes only increases the drive and filament requirement. R L MEASURES,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00992.html (9,900 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:48:55 -0700
Example: -- Goal: build a 12kW amplifier using a 4000v anode supply: To do so using 3-500Zs: c. a dozen would be needed. Since the feedback C is 0.15pF per 3-500Z, the total feedback C for a dozen is
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00993.html (10,409 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:22:10 -0400
If some may remember, we picked apart an 11 meter amp on here which was listed on Ebay that used six or eight 3-500Z's. Also, we picked apart one using eight 4CX250B's. There was one model using four
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00995.html (11,876 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:40:19 +0100
Yes, but do you get the same useful output power from a distributed amplifier unless you have two antennas to feed? Doesn't half the output go into a terminating resistor? Steve _____________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01002.html (8,631 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:55:28 +0200
Sweep tube amps were quite common in Germany in the past when our power was limited to 150W total dissipation in the final stage. I built several myself, one GG with 5xPL519 doing 2KW out on all band
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01024.html (9,583 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:09:57 -0400
Peter, The Galaxy 2000 amp used (10) 6HF5 sweep tubes. It was also grid driven, and was an amateur amplifier. It was made by the Galaxy Electronics Company in Council Bluffs, Iowa. One thing to note
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01026.html (12,350 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] The maximum amount of 811As and 572Bs in parallel (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:00:36 -0700
Good point, Steve. I am not suggesting that a distributed amplifier be used for HF transmitting, I'm saying that paralleling tubes is possible but that additional effort must be made to reduce VHF ga
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01039.html (10,160 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu