Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Top\s+vs\s+bottom\s+posting\s+was\:\s+Watch\s+out\s+for\s+a\s+scam\s+by\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Top\s+vs\s+bottom\s+posting\s+was\:\s+Watch\s+out\s+for\s+a\s+scam\s+by\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Top vs bottom posting was: Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:15:16 -0400; Well, you pays yer money (not) .... but it seems to me a case can be made for either. Mobile users certainly refer top posting because their small screens make bottom posting a real pain. Even on a P; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00181.html (9,065 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Top vs bottom posting was: Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:08:15 -0400; How do you know which is the last post? They do not necessarily fall in order and often nothing is included from previous posts. It's quite common to see answers appear before the question, depending; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00187.html (9,348 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]