Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+U\.S\.\s+Military\s+chooses\s+Harris\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+U\.S\.\s+Military\s+chooses\s+Harris\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:23:32 -0400; Got this in an e-mail today about what the Marines chose for communications; U.S. Marine Corps awards $75 million contract for AN/PRC-150 (C) high-frequency radios Apr 26, 2005 4:12 PM Harris Corpora; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00584.html (7,541 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:29:09 -0700 (PDT); Depends how "embedded" the crypto is. Unless it's an easily removed module, it will never be surplussed out. Joe, N3JI __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00585.html (9,439 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: ToddRoberts2001@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:41:33 EDT; U.S. Marine Corps awards $75 million contract for AN/PRC-150 (C) high-frequency radios Apr 26, 2005 4:12 PM I have a Harris RF-590 receiver and last summer I had sent it to Harris for service. I had; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00586.html (7,492 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:44:51 -0400; Joe, I doubt the transceiver will be either unless the encryption is removeable. However, they have a slew of extras including a 400 watt solid state amp. It weighs 45 pounds so it must be a combinat; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00587.html (10,272 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: K8MLM@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:37:41 EDT; It's part of the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) acquisition. JTRS radios are software defined. Crypto is not hardware implemented, it's software implemented. It's the same kind of modern software; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00588.html (7,511 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:54:44 -0700; That may be, but as James Bond says, "Never say never." When I was in the Air Force, our planes had a secret radar transponder called an APX-6, if I recall correctly. (Now, all commercial airliners c; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00589.html (8,013 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:21:26 -0700 (PDT); If it holds a key, it's probably not going too far. The devices we use to simply store keys for later use in the field, while not classified when zeroed are still not going anywhere. Lose one, and yo; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00590.html (8,649 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:28:11 -0400; The Harris writeup says that the crypto is by way of an "ignition key" which can be removed from the keyboard, eliminating the need to secure the radio. This sounds like the scheme used with the STU; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00595.html (10,816 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT); That's probably the case as the STU III's replacement uses the same setup, as well as all the latest crypto gear I've seen (KIV-7 family, for example). However, all of that gear is also CCI and canno; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00596.html (11,146 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:23:29 -0400; While I may be a bit paranoid, lets please cease the "classified" talk on an international service. Thanks 73 bob de w9ge _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contes; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00597.html (7,977 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: <chris@yipyap.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:53:08 -0000; Off topic, possibly. State secret, no way. (To contiue the off topic part...) My opinions of military procurement were formulated by a short stint in MARS. It was apparent then that they would rather; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00598.html (8,242 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: G3rzp@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:20:53 EDT; I haven't seen anything here about encryption that I haven't read quite some time ago in the magazines. About 25 years ago, when I was involved with SINGCARS, I was somewhat surprised to find that I; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00601.html (8,378 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] U.S. Military chooses Harris (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:38:38 -0700 (PDT); The equipment itself isn't classified, but it is handled differently than a plain old piece of gear. The stuff that goes in and through it is certainly classified, though. But either way, I'm done wi; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00603.html (8,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]