Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+VHF\s+Parasitics\s+re\-revisited\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+VHF\s+Parasitics\s+re\-revisited\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] VHF Parasitics re-revisited (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 20:05:44 -0700; For years VHF parasitic suppression has been done in the anode circuit of an amplifier. While it does work, I wonder if it might be better to apply suppression measures in the grid circuit, especiall; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00014.html (9,015 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] VHF Parasitics re-revisited (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:00:03 +0100; Part of the problem has been carbon comp resistors which were (still are?) widely used. They are unsuited to the application and there have been better alternatives for at least 30 years. Being pedan; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00015.html (11,550 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] VHF Parasitics re-revisited (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 06:59:52 -0700; To me, a 100pF C without a series-R is likely to create a worrisome high-Q resonance in conjunction with its Cu leads. Since it is an indicator of VHF gain, an important measurement is the parallel-e; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00016.html (14,196 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] VHF Parasitics re-revisited (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:17:37 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Well, that's an interesting observation. Is it possible to have a triode g-g oscillate without at least a rudimentary resonant circuit in both the anode and gr; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00017.html (7,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]