Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Value\?\s+\(PART\s+TWO\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "n2kw@juno.com" <n2kw@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:16:50 GMT
I guess I'm not as good a communicator as I thought? I found all of these Hi-Power parts in my attic, and asked what they were worth/// (or at least, that was what I meant!) It is gratifying to know
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00156.html (7,783 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:57:59 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Asking how much something is worth is an invitation to all sorts of responses, and the wide response you got is reasonably expected. If you want to know the price, sell them on eBay. From day to day,
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00157.html (9,124 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:30:37 -0400
Since you expect your version of a "fair to you" price for unknown used tubes to be 1/2 of NOS RETAIL (as stated in an email) you might as well put them back in the attic. To expect a buyer to have t
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00158.html (9,785 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:17:11 -0500
Allen, You are not dealing with a commodity. These things are sold in low enough volume and with a lot of variables beyond what is listed. So the selling price in any one instance is going to depend
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00160.html (11,408 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:45:46 -0700
"some people don't realize how obnoxious that can be. My simple question is "What are these things worth?" If what I sell is anything less than 100%, send it back. But don't try to switch a ringer, m
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00172.html (10,251 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: Commander John <crazytvjohn@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
I find the entire thread irritating. I don't want your stuff. you eat it. john W9ZY   _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00179.html (9,996 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "DAVE WHITE" <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:41:57 +0100
"But don't try to switch a ringer, my stuff is marked." Most Ham Radio sales and trades are done on a basis of trust and mutual respect. Most of us on this list know each other and - despite the odd
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00181.html (10,016 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:23:14 +0100
I've had a couple of deals go wrong with hams. In both cases it was not deliberate deception, but stupidity on the result of a ham advertising something as X, then sending me Y. 1) I bought some diod
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00182.html (9,831 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Value? (PART TWO) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:00:04 -0400
basis of this forum which is hams helping hams and he is only interested in retail sales at maximum profit. Can you imagine anyone paying 1/2 current retail for a 4-1000A of unknown condition and ex
/archives//html/Amps/2011-07/msg00183.html (12,107 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu