- 21. Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:28:24 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks, Karl. Makes perfect sense. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.co
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00280.html (9,583 bytes)
- 22. Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37 (score: 1)
- Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:41:52 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
- Bill said: "I do take exception to the part about "not technically able...". Hams can do anything the commercial boys can do, it's a matter of desire, not ability." Response: No question that many ar
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00284.html (10,219 bytes)
- 23. Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:01:20 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My objection was to your all-inclusive comment. Had you said "some amateurs..." I would have been silent. Bill, W6WRT _____________
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00286.html (9,120 bytes)
- 24. Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37 (score: 1)
- Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:18:45 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
- "My objection was to your all-inclusive comment. Had you said "some amateurs..." I would have been silent. Bill, W6WRT" My original post was intended to comment on how the FCC viewed us, rather on th
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00288.html (9,935 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu