Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+no\s+images\s+allowed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+no\s+images\s+allowed\?\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:02:47 -0700; Are there still security or other reasons why the reflector will not allow .jpg images to be attached to emails? Especially on this reflector, having the ability to display schematics and pictures wo; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00188.html (7,683 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:10:23 -0400; Bill: In lieu of a moderator response, I am sure it is a server storage space issue. This list is not alone in this regard. I certainly agree! - Jim W4ENE ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00189.html (7,528 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:42:07 -0400; If I recall correctly, .jpg files are an executable file type, and could therefore harbor viruses. I'm not suggesting malice on the part of someone on this reflector, rather an unwitting relay, or ev; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00192.html (8,773 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:48:16 -0400; Space for the archives is one issue but it is also to squelch spam, viruses and phishing, which usually use binaries or malware embedded in HTML. Mike, W1NR __________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00193.html (7,691 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:49:00 -0800; Discalimer: I'm not a list owner or moderator. This mailing list is built on Mailman software. If you google this software and read everything that's currently online about it, you'll find that forwa; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00194.html (9,235 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:45:52 -0400; This is running far OT, but pertinent. HTML mail is as bad as those carrying attachments as far as infections go now days. OTOH even visiting reputable pages is no guarantee you won't get infected. S; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00195.html (10,115 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:49:52 -0400; I don't know that *.jpg are executable but since jpg are a compressed format they may well be used for "mischief." In any case, MailMan is a platform agnostic (multi-platform) text based e-mail forw; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00196.html (10,445 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:54:48 +0000; /*snip*/ I don't care because I don't worry about any viruses as I use LINUX which is 100% free from infection from all M$ malwear, but viruses are just one reason to dis-allow binaries. Another big; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00197.html (8,904 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:52:59 -0700 (PDT); Actually, the problem is with viruses, not the speed of the modem. Many viruses are spread as an attachment. Therefore, no attachments. Glen, K9STH Website: http://k9sth.com Are there still security; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00198.html (7,947 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:54:06 -0500; <<<I find it interesting that the censor of the RTTY list would be the one to cause problems here.>>> Joe, he just asked a question. Asking a question shouldn't "cause problems..." unless you are the; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00201.html (7,808 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:14:22 -0400; Asked a question to which he should have already known the answer. That's agitation ... looking to cause a problem. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00202.html (8,670 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:55:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I asked the question to see if there was a way to change things so that images, especially schematics, could be included in emails. Describing a circuit with words is highly; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00204.html (8,927 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 01:57:44 +0000; _____________________ /| /| | | / O O\__ | trolls. Thank you. | / \ | --Mgt. | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| *; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00205.html (9,484 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 02:34:54 -0400; Stop this nonsense and get down to some serious questions like the issues with an 833A tube in Grounded Grid operation. Why is the Plate-Cathode capacitance more than the Plate-Grid Capacitance? Can; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00207.html (8,480 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:47:50 -0700; I don't have an 833A to measure, but why is this impossible? The filament is big and has a lot of area and so is the plate. Although the grid is lightly closer to the plate than the filament is, the; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00208.html (8,759 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:48:14 -0700; When I need to do that, I put the image on my website as a pdf and post a link in the email. Of course, not everyone has a website. :) Another very good reason for no attachments is that some folks a; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00209.html (8,878 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 01:29:40 -0800; That is the reason Yahoo! Groups went to the system they currently have. Nobody has to download the attachment unless they are interested in it. But everybody gets a LINK to the attachment that appea; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00211.html (10,315 bytes)
18. [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:45:24 -0700; That is the reason Yahoo! Groups went to the system they currently have. Nobody has to download the attachment unless they are interested in it. But everybody gets a LINK to the attachment that appea; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00214.html (8,903 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] Why no images allowed? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:54:05 -0400; I do that with this reflector. There are many places that will allow you to store photos, PDFs, and other binaries to which you can link. I do make it a practice to never open links that don't tell m; /archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00226.html (11,571 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]