Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+people\s+don\'t\s+build\s+amps\.\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:56:47 -0400
The reason for homebrewing is a slight, but valid turn from the original direction of the "Good Engineering" thread, There are many reasons for people not home brewing and the fear of failure is just
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00625.html (13,642 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:56:35 -0500
-- Interesting post...I have some of the same questions. Options for inexpensive, reasonably sized plate transformers? -- -- Can someone provide sourcing info on reliable, reasonably priced pulls for
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00626.html (10,424 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:16:30 -0400
Roger, if you look at the AM and some other forums you will find home brew is alive and well. Those hams dont need $1000 tubes to make power and are mostly making do with glass bottles of the past wi
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00627.html (18,440 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Shon Edwards <sre.1966@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:28:41 -0600
I love this posting. So true. I fall into the category of "technical, but not an engineer". It is true that many of the up and coming ham generation is not very technical. I have three sons, aged 9,
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00628.html (13,739 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Andy <andy@gd0tep.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:10:33 +0000
An interesting thread this one... Here's my penny... Having spent considerable time trying to get a commercial 50mhz amplifier to work as advertised, and learning from the experience, I decided I'd l
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00630.html (13,577 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:58:27 -0400
Carl came up with some such as pole pigs. Another would be old commercial repeaters that had amps built in. I'd guess some of those transformers would be good for about a KW PEP out. Of course the po
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00633.html (16,935 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:28:44 -0500
I think a 5000 would need a remote blower and lots of sound dampening measures to be a quiet desk-top amp. Other than more complexity, why hasn't the practice of using switched band specific ( or ran
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00637.html (8,375 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:07:02 -0400
Yes, at its full ratings. At 1500-2500W PEP you can use a low speed blower and a fat wheel and not even hear it. It takes a lot of power to even heat up the thermal mass of the anode when its loafin
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00640.html (10,249 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Schmuke" <rdj@wildblue.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:08:07 -0500
A week ago I posted a request for help and/or suggestions on my first amp. I got very few replies but I am thankful for the replies I received.. This is a very interesting thread so I thought I would
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00641.html (8,898 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:16:50 -0400
If you go to the Amps home page you can search the archives back into the 90's for all those answers. A modest collection of ARRL and W6SAI era E&E Handbooks are always a good investment. And then th
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00642.html (10,290 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
Good post Bill, and on target. Modern systems are extremely complex, and as an active participant in team design, to get a modern product out the door takes the involvement of many engineers with dif
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00646.html (12,664 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "David Cutter" <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:18:24 -0800
Paul I posted a note a few days ago regarding use of ptc resistors, thermostats, et al as protection devices. It went unchallenged, so I guess folk are not interested much in safety, or, at least onl
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00647.html (8,057 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: dd3ly@arcor.de
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:27:36 +0100 (CET)
Dear Roger, the industry of ham radio gear placed such a weird perfectionism in our brain that we find a home brewed linear amp which has not all knobs symmetrical arranged and in one line is UGLY! W
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00652.html (9,976 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:39 -0400
< The industry of ham radio gear placed such a weird perfectionism in our brain that we find a home brewed linear amp which has not all knobs symmetrical arranged and in one line is UGLY! What's real
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00663.html (8,492 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:08:01 -0400
I like symmetry and perfection on women followed by performance. Radios I want performance first. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00670.html (9,438 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:52:06 -0400
I think that's a reasonable approach. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00673.html (10,015 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Eban" <alexeban@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:14:31 +0300
...as I happens, even transcevers are being built today! G5JXP has done a sterling job with designing a PIC controlled, DDS equipped and DSP operated with sterling results: the STAR. There are close
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00674.html (11,777 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:59:11 -0400
Maybe it is a lack of a passion to create something original just to do it an in turn you happen to learn something. 73 Bill wa4lav ________________________________________ From: amps-bounces@contest
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00677.html (12,691 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps. (score: 1)
Author: "Zeitler, Lane LT, FST-1" <zeitlel@cpr3.navy.mil>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:21:34 -0800
Hi Rich, I USED to be very fluent with amp design and theory. Probably not nearly as fluent as most of the common 'posters' to this reflector but I did successfully HB some amps in the early 90's. At
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00775.html (14,497 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu