Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+WinLink\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:05:34 -0500
I just ran across something (2-3 days back actually) about the ARRL almost secertely pushing through a new bandplan for Winlink, I think was the name. I have read some others opinions before I made t
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00156.html (7,847 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:24:38 EST
This WinLink issue went right by me. WTF is this all about? What does it have to do with our FCC license? Please enlighten us (me). 73, Gerald K5GW _______________________________________________ Amp
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00163.html (6,370 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Lowell" <elowell@maine.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:06:23 -0500
Greetings all, I have heard this before and it mystifies me. 1- Winlink is a software program that can be used to control a PACTOR/Packet BBS. I am unsure of how this threatens anyone or can be "secr
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00165.html (9,246 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:16:23 -0500
Gerald, Here's one place to read about it and some quotes by one of the voters on the subject. http://www.af4k.com/Ham/dissent.htm Best, Will ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** On 3/6/05 at 11:24 AM TexasRF@aol.c
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00167.html (7,983 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: John D'Ausilio <jdausilio@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:30:27 -0500
Heh .. the league is a magazine publishing company .. period. Anyone who expects them to do anything that's contrary to that basic mission (like publishing unflattering reviews of advertiser's equipm
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00169.html (9,518 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:05:56 -0800
160m has no such limits and it is a delight. 80m has limits and it is a vast wasteland -- like unto that described in Newton Minnow's speech to the National Association of Broadcasters on May 9, 1961
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00171.html (9,978 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: PA3DUV <pa3duv@planet.nl>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:13:44 +0100
The dogs are barking.... but the troops are marching on! Cheers, Dick Knol PA3DUV Winlink PMBO operator _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00172.html (8,641 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:23:38 -0500
Rich, One word, EXACTLY! See to me, the bandplan change dont bother me one bit, nor does any of the troubles this may or may not cause. What does stick in my craw if the way this was handled. How in
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00174.html (12,667 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:56:54 -0500
They haven't been very secret about it; the proposed bandplan is available via http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html . Personally, I don't have a problem with switching to a bandwidth-based all
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00180.html (10,291 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:14:41 -0500
Dave, What I read was that this was not announced until after the vote and a bunch of hoopla went on before they would put it out publically. I guess the link was what become of the afterwards. The w
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00181.html (13,116 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: PA3DUV <pa3duv@planet.nl>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:30:58 +0100
At Baath party elections the participants were shot in the head AFTER casting their vote. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00183.html (11,202 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:12:33 -0500
Pat, I'm not 100% sure but I thought that federal law says that any non-profit organization must show it's financials when asked. I thought they also were made to make them public at least once a yea
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00186.html (19,038 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:31:26 -0500
When the CEO of United Way was busted, I forget all he had fenagled the corporation out of. I know a mansion, private plane, and limo comes to mind. If I recall, he did about the same thing until the
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00187.html (22,861 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 16:44:52 -0800
"I'm not 100% sure but I thought that federal law says that any non-profit organization must show it's financials when asked." There is a difference between a non-profit organization and a 501(c) 3 o
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00188.html (8,970 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "William O'Hara" <who_icrr@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:58:35 -0500
Colin, You are in correct. All incorporations that are organized and request IRS to grant status under 501(c) are not for profit. It has to be a 501(c)3 to receive the "full" deduction. Other entitie
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00189.html (10,764 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:38:28 -0800
"It has to be a 501(c)3 to receive the "full" deduction. Other entities do not have the same rules." This is incorrect. IRC 501(c) sets forth a number of different organizations that receive the "ful
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00190.html (9,626 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "William O'Hara" <who_icrr@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:14:46 -0500
that I think that this is very important to distinguish. Such organizations generally fall under the rules for charitable organizations in their states of incorporation. The agency or constitutional
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00192.html (9,759 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] WinLink (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:13:23 -0800
"You get your status from the IRS and not your state government. I was talking about the charitable contribution from the donor. The recipient should be a 501(c)3." Reply - you get your status as a n
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00193.html (9,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu