Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+YC\-156\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+YC\-156\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] yc-156 (score: 1): Author: Bob Gibson <w5rg@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:24:47 -0700 (PDT); Hi..I have two YC-156 tubes for sale..one with 02 code date and the other has a 04 code date...Both work..325.00 for each one..Bob _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Am; /archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00361.html (6,140 bytes)
2. [Amps] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:13:02 -0700; Has anyone constructed a pair of YC-156`s for 80&160? I would be interested in details concerning cathode matching network,effects of feedthru capacitance,etc..Pse reply direct if interested..Thanks.; /archives//html/Amps/2008-08/msg00126.html (6,245 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:36:57 +0000; Norman Hockler wrote: Charlie, I do not know the history of the YC-130 but the YC-156 ( 3CPX5000A7) is as rugged a tube as you can find. This tube ( a high mu triode) was designed by Eimac for the me; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00513.html (10,715 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: Norman Hockler <norsan@bright.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:31:25 -0500; Charlie, I do not know the history of the YC-130 but the YC-156 ( 3CPX5000A7) is as rugged a tube as you can find. This tube ( a high mu triode) was designed by Eimac for the medical business as the; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00505.html (8,778 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:20:39 -0500; life, Many years ago, I managed the Jacksonville Lodestar communications facility where one FM transmitter, now owned by Clear Channel, uses the 816R5. That transmitter should have never been design; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00468.html (8,028 bytes)
6. [Amps] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: "Charles Wooten NF4A" <nf4a@knology.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:04:43 -0600; In the broadcast business there is a standing joke that has a lot of truth to it..."Never buy a transmitter with a tube that begins with a Y".....The main reason is the Eimac YC-130 (a souped up 4CX1; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00467.html (7,553 bytes)
7. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: W6RU@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 06:45:33 -0800; Norm has had them .... try him at: norsan@bright.net Terry W6RU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00555.html (7,151 bytes)
8. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: w7xu@dtgnet.com (W7XU Arliss); Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 07:43:10 +0000; Hi, Where or from whom may I obtain a YC-156 (pull)? Thanks & 73, Arliss W7XU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00549.html (6,362 bytes)
9. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: k1ta@earthlink.net (Bob Marston); Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 19:25:12 -0800; To: <amps@contesting.com> Bill to see if I have his permission to put these notes up. The property rights may not be exclusively his though. I've promised to get back to those who have made individua; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00075.html (8,285 bytes)
10. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 04:17:53 -0800; pep. ? Carl - - I did not say that I measured the IMD at -50db. In Class A, such IMD is typical. You seemed to be talking about hams who measured such an IMD level, which is why I asked the yet to b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00059.html (7,272 bytes)
11. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:09:15 -0500; On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:22:16 -0800 Bob Marston <k1ta@earthlink.net> writes: Been away so excuse the delay in replying Sufficient details for the moment. Bill Orr might have his own comments if you ar; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00040.html (11,225 bytes)
12. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:21:46 -0500; Something a few others seem to not understand Peter. With 5 or 6kV on the plate and a good standing current, it would And cheap to obtain. Why ?? Whats the yearly $$ difference between a 45-50% effic; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00036.html (9,015 bytes)
13. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:21:18 -0500; On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:28:23 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> writes: And as you asked in another post....who has an exciter capable of -50dB IMD? Cheers...Carl _________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00042.html (11,157 bytes)
14. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: sbookout@mnsinc.com (Steve); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:38:16 -0500; Hello all, Realistically, what type of drive requirement, and at what voltage level, are required for 1500 watt output? For instance, I use Ten Tecs with 100 watts of drive, not 120 or 140, so would; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00654.html (7,928 bytes)
15. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: k1ta@earthlink.net (Bob Marston); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:22:16 -0800; OK Carl I dug out my W6SAI Amateur Service Newsletters just for you. And all the subscribers to the Amps List. BTW These notes are a treasure trove of amplifier design info. From Pi Pi-L Networks to; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00646.html (10,070 bytes)
16. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: ericw@accessone.com (Eric Wicklund); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:36:54 -0800; What is the best way to set up the drive for the YC-156? Since the cathode is connected to one side of the filament, do you run a trifilar choke with bias on the extra choke leg? I'm hoping to do thi; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00641.html (7,694 bytes)
17. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: norsan@bright.net (Norman Hockler); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:03:27 -0500; Hi all, Followed this thread on the YC-156 with interest since, as many of you know, I sell these tubes. I have original Eimac specs on the YC-156. If any one would like a hard copy e-mail me your ad; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00640.html (7,786 bytes)
18. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: k1ta@earthlink.net (Bob Marston); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:51:50 -0800; http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk When you get to the homepage select the search icon (binoculars) anf type in YC-156 Have fun! 73s Bob K1TA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submission; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00639.html (8,022 bytes)
19. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:28:23 -0800; ? One of the advantages of using the 8171 at amateur power levels is that its 7" (178mm) anode-cooler needs only a 1700-rpm blower instead of a 3400-rpm blower, which makes Much More Noise. ? For an; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00633.html (10,498 bytes)
20. [AMPS] YC-156 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:28:21 -0800; ? good point. However, it goes without saying that one would be doing the tuneup at c. the 15k in, 9k out level -- into a dummy load, of course!. . . ? [chortle] ? [guffaw] - cheers, Peter Rich... R; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00632.html (8,900 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]