Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+best\s+tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+best\s+tuner\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "k9sd" <k9sd@ezl.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:45:36 -0600; I think I will build a tuner...there are lots of diagrams but which one is the best ?? I have several vacuum variables and a monster roller inductor...size isn't a problem..I just want a good one.. I; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00485.html (6,621 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:06:31 -0500; Hi Sam, They say that the SPC transmatch ("Series Parallel Capacitance") is a tough one to beat...I see it in newer versions of the ARRL HANDBOOK. In fact, just this past week I built another, smalle; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00487.html (8,634 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:19:01 -0800; Check out W8ZR's EZ Tuner. I built the bare bones version of it. Contact me offline for details if interested. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00488.html (8,087 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:31:49 -0500; Good Day All, Just as soon as the nicad batteries in my digital camera here might charge up(!), I'll post a few shots of the S.P.C. transmatch that I built here last week, using nothing more than sur; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00500.html (10,676 bytes)
5. [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:09:00 -0600; For coax I like the old Lewis Mc Coy "ultimate transmatch" from ARRL handbook This design was used by Murch in their tuner It seems to work well for my G5RV If open wire line is the goal, go directly; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00511.html (7,253 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: chas <chasm@texas.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:29:24 -0600; Like it says up there... Amps... in my mind that means QRO... how useful are these little pocket tuners AFTER the amp where they belong? and if you say good when the amp is off, that really does not; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00512.html (8,171 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:33:36 -0500; Good Day ALL Yet Again, If anyone wishes to see the fruits of my labour here in the matter of a HB transmatch, feel free to click onto this website: http://www.flickr.com/photos/15888272@N05/?saved=1; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00515.html (7,658 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:04:57 -0800 (GMT-08:00); When the question of "best tuner" was raised, I began thinking about how I would answer. The more I thought, the less able I am to give a simple answer. The problem is there are too many variables -; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00516.html (9,183 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] best tuner (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:08:54 -0600; Eddy Kudos on the very nice job Paul K0UYA -- Original Message -- From: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net> To: <amps@contesting.com> Cc: "k9sd" <k9sd@ezl.com> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 2:33 P; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00521.html (9,013 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]