Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ceramic\s+vs\s+glass\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ceramic\s+vs\s+glass\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] ceramic vs glass (score: 1): Author: Zev Darack <zevdarack@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:59:52 -0500; Looking on eBay and others I almost never see 3cx1200 but plenty of 8877 for $400 and 3cx3000 at realistic prices listed. If my 3cx1200 tube dies I won't replace it...my daily amp is an lk500 for tha; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00282.html (15,419 bytes)
22. [Amps] ceramic vs glass (score: 1): Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:51:32 -0500; Exactly. The increased need for protection isn't due to any differences between glass and ceramic construction, but all the other internal changes that were introduced at the same time - along with; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00284.html (7,434 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 22
Page: [1] [2]