Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+filament\s+choke\s+questions\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:45:03 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Guys, I'm making more and more progress on my amp, thanks for all of the help answering questions and such, it's appreciated.   Some have asked for pictures, I'll post some shortly. "RFC2 - 14 tur
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00131.html (7,926 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: "Han Higasa" <higasa@plum.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:59:07 +0900
Hi Paul Just have survived strong wind of typhoon 18 here. The purpose of the filament choke for 3CX800A7 is, to keep filament's RF potential neutral, to avoid a breakdown of cathode-heater insulatio
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00133.html (8,912 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 04:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Whilst the explanation below makes perfect sense, I have 1kW and 500W ex commercial FM (100 MHz) broadcast transmitters made by CCI - the former uses an 8877 and the latter a 3CX800A7. Neither of the
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00135.html (9,440 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: Don Kessler <ki6sz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 19:57:51 -0400
Interesting... I recently completed redesign of several amps, all are single and two-tube amps using the Eimac (CPI) 3CPX800A7. The datasheet for this tube as well as for the 8877 states that both fi
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00146.html (8,788 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:24:04 -0400
The same answer applies to the 8877 family. On HF its usually not required and ham amp manufacturers are notoriously cheap. On VHF it makes a difference especially in a 3 hole 3CPX800A7 conversion of
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00147.html (10,130 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: Don Kessler <ki6sz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:29:15 -0400
Interesting... We recently finished redesign of several RF amps, all using the 3CPX800A7. The original amps all had one filament lead tied directly to the chassis without any filament choke. The othe
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00148.html (9,290 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: Martin <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:33:40 +0200
The Harris AM7224/URC (RF-353) employs the 8877 also without any filament choke. Works. 73 Martin, OK1RR Carl napsal(a): _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contest
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00151.html (10,725 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] filament choke questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:40:22 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Very little shunting to ground will be taking place. The capacitance merely becomes part of the tuned input circuit. Having said that however, I agree with others that a fila
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00153.html (8,177 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu