Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+grid\s+resonance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+grid\s+resonance\s*$/: 90 ]

Total 90 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:57:19 -0400; You need to reread the article Wil. What they said and what you got from it are two totally different things. You also better look at how the equipment works before launching into oversimplification; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00282.html (12,057 bytes)
82. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:49:38 -0700; Correct. By coupling the dipper to nothing and sweeping each range, the false dips are found. Once the false dips are noted, they can be ignored. In a well-designed dipper, false dips are few and sli; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00284.html (10,277 bytes)
83. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:15:50 -0700; Good point, Ian. The sentence should have read: The grid is no longer acting as a perfect shield between the output and the input of the amplifying device. Correct, but it does tell the operator wher; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00285.html (10,890 bytes)
84. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:49:05 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Please guys, this is how flame wars start. There is nothing at all "magic" about nichrome wire. It's characteristics and usage have been explained in great det; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00300.html (9,363 bytes)
85. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:01:25 -0400; N7WS measured a nichrome suppressor and a regular suppressor and found no difference at all behavior at VHF. I've done the same. Nichrome causes the greatest Q change at the lowest frequency, and ha; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00301.html (9,313 bytes)
86. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:41:21 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Precisely. Thank you Joe. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00302.html (8,794 bytes)
87. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:46:15 -0700; When the grid is grounded, isn't the grid support cone grounded, Tom? Ignoring a resonance is good engineering practice? So the 3-500Z has a grid resonance at 95MHz. Curiously, this happens to be the; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00310.html (10,817 bytes)
88. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:19:00 -0400; Correct Bill! Also, concerning the so-called comparison by Coilcraft, I didn't want to sound biased so I did some research to prove my point. It is as follows; The comparison was done using the below; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00312.html (16,719 bytes)
89. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:52:49 -0700; Mr. Rauch -- At 100MHz, N7WS' measurements showed that the parallelequivalent resistance (Rp) of a suppressor constructed from Ni-Cr wire is 103-ohms, and the Rp of a similar suppressor constructed f; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00343.html (10,343 bytes)
90. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:04:10 -0400; N7WS' complete conclusions, which you continue to ignore and refuse to print, were that the same result could be obtained with a conventional suppressor by simply decreasing the value of the resistor; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00380.html (9,884 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 90
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]