Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+new\s+amp\s+race\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+new\s+amp\s+race\s*$/: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Charles H <k4vud@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 01:53:03 +0000; I watched as EU ruined itself in contests with super high power big antenna stations. Result seems to be they can not hear weaker long distant stations.... so end up working each other in a band full; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00193.html (6,845 bytes)
2. [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 19:20:26 -0700; <I watched as EU ruined itself in contests with super high power big antenna stations. Result seems to be they can not hear weaker long distant stations.... so end up working each other in a band ful; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00194.html (8,826 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 03:23:17 +0000 (UTC); I'd blame this more on sunspot lows than egos. Egos have always been with us, but we are seeing unprecedented poor solar conditions. Every cycle since 1958 has been weaker than the one before. Even; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00196.html (9,642 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 04:27:05 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The answer to low sunspots is not a bigger amplifier, it's a bigger antenna. The biggest amp in the world won't help your reception. 73, Bill W6WRT _____; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00197.html (7,659 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 04:34:59 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Why would that irritate you? It's probably the best radio-related advice you will ever get. And what does having or not having a legal limit amp have to; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00198.html (7,407 bytes)
6. [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 00:20:00 -0700; <REPLY The answer to low sunspots is not a bigger amplifier, it's a bigger <antenna. The biggest amp in the world won't help your reception. 73, Bill W6WRT and replace em with a 2 or 3 el 40m yagi...; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00200.html (10,775 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:56:01 +0200; You can´t compare antenna gain with transmit power. Antenna gain is one part but more important is the different elevation angles a directive antenna or the right antenna can supply. You can´t hear w; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00201.html (8,016 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 08:12:56 -0500; But it WILL help you be heard by someone with a littler antenna. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 5/20/2017 11:27 PM, Bill Turner wro; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00203.html (8,994 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 09:51:01 -0400; <I watched as EU ruined itself in contests with super high power big antenna stations. Result seems to be they can not hear weaker long distant stations.... so end up working each other in a band ful; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00205.html (11,673 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:07:13 -0400; I watched as EU ruined itself in contests with super high power big antenna stations. Result seems to be they can not hear weaker long distant stations.... so end up working each other in a band full; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00206.html (13,618 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 11:07:57 -0500; And they're doing it with V-6's. Ford Eco-Boost V6 will make 365hp. Of course it's twin turbo's make that possible. My 1969 Chevy El Camino SS with a 396 big block would make 375. The goal used to be; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00208.html (9,806 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:03:16 +0000; My own motivation to use legal limit power is man-made noise on the other end. In the 1980's I worked lots of QRP. First just one watt in DSB, then I improved to 5W in DSB, then 5W in SSB, then 30W.; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00209.html (11,988 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: <w8hw@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 13:04:46 -0400; You say -- The biggest amp in the world won't help your reception. I say -- Yes it can HOW? By asking the OTHER guy to turn on HIS amp. QRP is fun only when it is a choice for both sides of the QSO.; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00210.html (9,734 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "sm0aom@telia.com" <sm0aom@telia.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 19:32:32 +0200 (CEST); The rise of the man-made noise floor is a real problem, but I do not hold my breath for the Authorities to increase the legal power limit for these reasons. On the contrary, I foresee quite severe po; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00211.html (13,169 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 18:27:34 +0000 (UTC); Sure you can. You have a certain amount of $$$ (or whatever your local currency is) to spend on improving your station. Each dollar can be spent on raising transmit power, raising antenna gain, or ra; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00212.html (9,270 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 18:50:57 +0000 (UTC); Because it feels like "do as I say, not as I do." A person who owns an amp is telling other hams not to buy one. If it's so useless, why does the poster have one himself? If the advice were "put up; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00213.html (9,580 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 19:01:52 +0000 (UTC); 90% of my operation is at night. Retirement is a long way away. 20 is occasionally great, but I spend far more time on 40, 80, and 160, and I'd like to spend more time on 30. Bingo, Jim has nailed it; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00214.html (10,794 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 12:23:12 -0700; I don't know of any tri-banders that will give you more than about 7 dB over a dipole (dBd), and most are in the range of 3-5 dBd. Stack a pair and pick up another 3 dB, as well as diversity of verti; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00215.html (10,439 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 20:54:57 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I agree about 15 and especially 10, but 20 is open quite a lot. Give it a try. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailin; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00218.html (8,693 bytes)
20. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 21:07:44 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: On a recent road trip, my 2017 Chevy Cruze with a 1.4 liter 4-cylinder turbo got 51.6 miles per gallon. Apples and oranges. I'll take apples. 73, Bill W6; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00219.html (8,655 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]