Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+one\s+more\s+time\s+\-\s+Ameritron\s+fuse\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] one more time - Ameritron fuse question (score: 1)
Author: "Dan" <dpipes@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:00:36 -0700
Well you guys are batting 100% so far i now have one more Ameritron 811H question. I have replaced the grid resitor and replaced all four tubes (one was shorted causing the resitor to blow). All is w
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00115.html (7,977 bytes)

2. [Amps] one more time - Ameritron fuse question (score: 1)
Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:43:03 -0500
Dan, Slow blow would be best in my opinion using 8 ampere fuses which in my opinion is still a little to small. I dont think running 10 or 12 ampere ones would hurt. When a short occurs, there's a hu
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00117.html (8,833 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] one more time - Ameritron fuse question (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:23:56 +0000
Dan wrote: Well you guys are batting 100% so far i now have one more Ameritron 811H question. I have replaced the grid resitor and replaced all four tubes (one was shorted causing the resitor to blow
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00119.html (9,467 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] one more time - Ameritron fuse question (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:38:04 -0800
In my experiences, slow-blow fuses are preferable with a C-filter HVPS due the high recurrent-peak requirement. On Jan 7, 2005, at 8:00 PM, Dan wrote: Well you guys are batting 100% so far i now have
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00122.html (8,854 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu