Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+plate\s+bypass\s+caps\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:38:04 -0700
I have an Ameritron plate choke mounted in my amp project. It is 225uH. With 2700 plate volts, this is 2544 ohms at 1.8 MHz and thus 1.06 amps. I am now assuming the plate bypass capacitor at the bas
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00093.html (7,555 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:42:09 -0800
Lots of .01 5-8 KV caps available on EBay from Chinese sellers. They are easy to deal with and sell pretty good stuff. I'm using some of their stuff in my 8877 project now underway. 73 Jim W7RY _____
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00094.html (7,913 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:22:36 -0600
Jim Second that from here! Got some great ceramic switches from the Soviets on ebay. They have the caps too. Paul K0UYA -- Original Message -- From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net> To: "Steve Flood" <kk7u
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00095.html (7,924 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:50:57 -0500
Im using CD .01 6KV that I got off an Ebay surplus components seller. Mylar type and USA made, about $1 each in 20 quantity. It has been my experience that 160M performance improves with the .01 whic
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00096.html (8,221 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:44:20 -0800
Yup! Here are some. They are 5000 PF but just put two of them in parallel for .01 at 4KV. Steve said 2700 volts. So these should work fine? Ebay Item number 260288197318 73 Jim W7RY _________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00099.html (9,465 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: Russ Williams <hrd998cc@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:15:17 -0800 (PST)
But will they handle the RF current? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00100.html (11,283 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:22:42 -0800
There is no RF current (or very little) to speak of at the BASE (cold RF end) of the plate choke. 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00101.html (11,621 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:06:01 -0800
end) of the plate choke." And, two in parallel handle twice as much rf current as one, in any event. 73, Colin K7FM _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00102.html (7,739 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: Russ Williams <hrd998cc@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Ooops; I mis-read as blocking caps. Oh well. Yes, they will be fine at the base of the plate choke; I use similar caps in my projects but use good doorknobs for blocking caps. Thanks. Russ __________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00103.html (8,386 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Eban" <alexeban@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:57:32 +0200
...OK guys! Just please remember: the RF current at the choke's base can be quite high, so RF withstanding current must be quite high! Apart from that, it's better to use different kinds of capacitor
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00105.html (9,743 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:50:52 -0600
That measurement is meaningless, unless you specify the frequency and the value of the RFC. For instance, the commonly used B&W 800 and 802 Chokes have a high current at the base when used on 160 me
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00108.html (9,649 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:12:44 -0700
I have quite a few of the old-style transmitting mica caps (C-D, Sangamo, Solar, etc.). Are these okay to use in a nearly-legal-limit amp for either plate-choke bypassing, or antenna load padders? So
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00154.html (9,027 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:30:33 -0500
A lot of those are contaminated by now and crack open when used. Unless you have a way to test them under power it will be a crap shoot. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00155.html (9,611 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:50:25 -0800
You have to know the value of the cap to know what the current value is. 7 amps at 420 volts for what value of capacitance? My guess this is for the entire load cap that you have. What is the RF curr
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00157.html (9,788 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:11:53 -0700
I did not give enough info. My loading cap is a 2100 pF variable. In case I need to pad that for tuning 160m, I was thinking of a 500pF padder that I can switch in. Running through PI-EL again, it lo
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00161.html (9,181 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:35:49 -0500
Select a cap or two that has at least twice the current rating. Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00164.html (9,598 bytes)

17. [Amps] Plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:41:50 -0500
Its even more fun when you are playing with Class C AM; a mode I have been enjoying lately again. Above a certain value you are beginning to shunt the audio riding on the DC (on both sides of the cho
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00166.html (7,884 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Amen, brother. Bob, WA2CKY Its even more fun when you are playing with Class C AM; a mode I have been enjoying lately again. Above a certain value you are beginning to shunt the audio riding on the D
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00177.html (8,580 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:42:04 -0500
Ah, come on Carl. If you like that glow, get a pair of 6C21s<:-)) They drive with no more than a slight breeze, and are a real challenge to neutralize on more than 3 bands at a time. I think the cath
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00180.html (9,945 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Plate bypass caps (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:23:20 -0500
Very true Roger! I built a 6C21 160M amp back when I was still using the stock NCL-2000; drove it with a 100V (factory 160 option) and later a T4XC. Tube was a NIB Matchlett and must have been $10 to
/archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00187.html (11,732 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu