Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+plate\s+bypass\s+caps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+plate\s+bypass\s+caps\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1): Author: "Roy" <royanjoy@ncn.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:49:12 -0600; About, "I have quite a few of the old-style transmitting mica caps (C-D, Sangamo, Solar, etc.). Are these okay to use in a nearly-legal-limit amp for either plate-choke bypassing, or antenna load pad; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00188.html (8,010 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1): Author: "Bill K0ZL" <k0zl.ham@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:30:33 -0700; 3 or 6 KV ceramics sold by RF Parts work best for plate bypass; However for other apps, the old postage stamp micas will work fine. I tested a whole bagfull of these things and they were all within o; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00189.html (10,748 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:56:19 -0500; I cant think of any postage amp micas that will handle over 2kV, most are much less, typically 500V. Since the early style SB-220 grid bypass caps and the 80M fixed loading cap are known failure item; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00190.html (12,272 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] plate bypass caps (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:59:35 -0500; Tubes get gassy, caps get leaky, resistors change values, bout the only thing that leaves is tank coils not changing values...Without outside interferrence <:-)) Old hams change values, while getting; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00192.html (7,908 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]