Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+proposed\s+rule\s+changes\s+about\s+amps\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Hix" <w4th@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 21:24:44 -0500
What do you think about the FCC proposals which will once again allow the manufacture of amps designed to operate on frequencies above 15 meters.....without modification that is. I remember in the 70
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00259.html (11,739 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 08:31:54 -0700
Thomas Hix wrote: What do you think about the FCC proposals which will once again allow the manufacture of amps designed to operate on frequencies above 15 meters.....without modification that is. In
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00261.html (7,814 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 12:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
As you said, it's already illegal to use them, so what does the extra rule do? Any swingin' CB'er can get a high power amp as it is (ham fests, etc.), so all this does is keep them from buying the **
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00262.html (7,936 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 08:49:04 -0700
On May 28, 2004, at 7:24 PM, Thomas Hix wrote: What do you think about the FCC proposals which will once again allow the manufacture of amps designed to operate on frequencies above 15 meters.....wit
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00264.html (9,204 bytes)

5. RE: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: "David Harmon" <K6XYZ@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:33:51 -0700
I don't think it matters either way.......... This is just like a lot of other 'rules' in this country.....immigration immediately comes to mind...... The 'rules' don't exist if they are not enforced
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00266.html (8,091 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 16:11:22 -0700
_________________________________________________________ The show stopper isn't the cost of the parts, it's the cost of the engineering and testing as well as the possible penalties if units get out
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00269.html (8,223 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps (score: 1)
Author: Paul Carr <paulcarr@barrow.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 22:21:28 -0800
Does this mean that kits for hams to build their own amps could be available again? That would be great. Paul WL7PC Thomas Hix wrote: What do you think about the FCC proposals which will once again a
/archives//html/Amps/2004-05/msg00274.html (7,874 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu