Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+real\s+component\s+measurements\s+at\s+RF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+real\s+component\s+measurements\s+at\s+RF\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] real component measurements at RF (score: 1): Author: "John Lyles" <jtml@losalamos.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:18:25 -0700; W7IUV's recent posting makes sense as to the pitfalls of measuring L and C with the various commercial instruments. There is one other device that wasn't mentioned, but is a less expensive alternativ; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00976.html (9,523 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] real component measurements at RF (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:37:35 -0400; The 4815A probe is becoming unobtanium and repairs are around $800. Ive been staring at my analyzer sitting on a shelf for several years now. For what I want to do in the shop up to 6M can be done wi; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00981.html (11,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]