Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+rotten\s+splatter\/\s+IMD\s+vs\.\s+Vcc\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: jljarvis@abs.adelphia.net (jljarvis)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:15:12 -0500
97.307(a): No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than necessary for the information rate and emission type being transmitted, in accordance with good amateur practice. 97.307(b)
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00019.html (8,796 bytes)

2. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: hydro@fx2.com (John)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:33:05 -0500
Actually for your info, poorly design ALC circuit (in the radio) can cause splatter in themselves.. Their are a lot of radio's that have serious overshoot & ALC IMD that allow large peaks to be trans
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00020.html (7,801 bytes)

3. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 15:34:50 -0800
? The cleanest SSB Ham transceiver that I ever measured was 38db down. [TS-830]
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00032.html (9,120 bytes)

4. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 15:35:20 -0800
? The best way to avoid ALC overshoot is to set the mic. gain for minimal ALC indication. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00034.html (8,218 bytes)

5. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: hydro@fx2.com (John)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:02:58 -0500
Richard actually the cleanest radio that I know of is the FT-102 yaesu with 3 6164B tubes ... I think QST product review tested it at -40 IMD at 100 watts out ........ John
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00037.html (7,637 bytes)

6. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:16:42 -0800
? Not bad. What issue of QST ? tnx, John - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00047.html (7,792 bytes)

7. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: hydro@fx2.com (John)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 00:31:19 -0500
Not sure what qst .. I think 1983 they tested the FT-102. I will have to dig out all my old issues. Their are other rigs that have low IMD ...the Kenwood TS-930 , 940, 950SDX... FT-1000D , FT-767 , 1
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00053.html (7,817 bytes)

8. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: k7fm@teleport.com (COLIN LAMB)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 5:47:42 -0800
The FT-102 was reviewed in QST - October of 1983. John has a pretty good memory. 3rd and 5th order imd was down 40 db. A real sleeper with regard to distortion in rigs with 12 volt finals is the Heat
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00065.html (9,081 bytes)

9. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:14:48 +0100
I can confirm the FT102 is fairly good on IMD - at least, mine is. It's got RF NFB on the 6146Bs. For no reason that I can explain, it's also very good on phase noise, too, although it does have a lo
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00066.html (7,933 bytes)

10. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:35:42 -0800
League website. They did measure -40dB 3rd order IMD. -WB2WIK/6
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00072.html (8,389 bytes)

11. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: garyschafer@attbi.com (Gary Schafer)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 10:45:33 -0500
I think that the collins S line equipment with it's negative feedback will make -40 db also. Even a little better when first aligned. 73 Gary K4FMX
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00074.html (8,410 bytes)

12. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:22:30 -0800
3rd down 40db plus 5th down 40db does not equal ­40db total IMD, which would still be over the 40db limit.. Clever. Another solution is switch the 12VDC at c. 100kHz, and use a FWD to produce 24
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00077.html (8,313 bytes)

13. [Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1)
Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:34:29 +0000
What's the reference, pep or each tone? Steve
/archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00078.html (8,111 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu