Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+schamatis\s+160\s+meter\s+amp\s+using\s+3cx3000a7\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "John" <ljdoyle@suscom-maine.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:22:36 -0500
Is there anyone on this web site that can help me out with a schematic for 160m amp using the 3x3 i have some talent with metal work and am very comfortable working from a schematic but am really cha
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00087.html (6,461 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:52:46 +0100 (CET)
What do you mean by "160m amp using the 3x3 "? What is a "3x3"? 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00090.html (6,972 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:52:17 -0600
3X3 = 3CX3000A7, 4X5 = 4CX5000*, 4X1 = 4-1000A, 4X3 = 4CX3000A. The correct Pronunciation is Three By Three. Little tubes are referred to like "a couple three fives" 35 = 3-500Z's. But mostly are ign
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00091.html (7,948 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:33 -0500
What if the tube in question is a 4CX1000 and not a 4-1000? Why not just spell it out like most of the world is used to seeing rather than trying to be cryptic or do short hand. More letters from the
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00092.html (10,080 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:35:25 -0800
I thought a 3x3 was a piece of lumber that used to measure 3" x 3" but nowadays is probably 2-1/2 x 2-1/2 or less (inflation).-WB2WIK/6 What if the tube in question is a 4CX1000 and not a 4-1000? Why
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00093.html (10,319 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:04:37 -0600
HA, because in the "Old Days" there wasn't keyboards in radio shacks, the words "Three By Three" or "MOJO" came out of your mouth and not a keyboard. Even after working in the computer world for a zi
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00094.html (12,892 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Carman" <lncarman@swbell.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:37:17 -0600
Hey Bob, You're a good man. I'm with you on this one. It took the 'guys of old' to get the 'guys of new' where they are today (technically). Please forgive 'those of new' of their attitudes toward 't
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00095.html (13,344 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:59:13 -0500
Sounds like CB jargon to me. In my 45 years I never heard hams use terms like that. I guess I have a three-by-two hundred sitting in my basement. 73 Bill wa4lav ______________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00096.html (11,344 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Carman" <lncarman@swbell.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:14:43 -0600
All I can say is that if you've been around long enough you can figure out lots of things. I've been around in the ham community since 1979 and there's a great variance in terminology. It's easy to d
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00098.html (12,725 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:46:01 -0500
Like Bill I have been in the game in excess of 45 years, I am not exactly ignorant of high power tubes and amplifiers, and haven't heard this stuff until recently. Being on a list that is supposed to
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00099.html (15,019 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:49:11 -0500
FYI Hams have been calling 3CX3000's 3 by 3's since the 60's or 70's. 4 by 5's and 4 by 1's (for 4-1000A's) are both common terms also. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Amps ma
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00100.html (8,735 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:53:13 -0600
3x200? Now you aren't allowed to BS us Bill, that's rude. Eimac has Built 150's and then jumped to 8972's in triodes. They also have a problem in tetrodes they go from 100's to 250's bypassing the 20
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00101.html (13,639 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:33:41 -0600
Hey Gary no problem. You wanna really get confused Tom and I will start spewing RACECAR Jargon intermixed with the radio stuff. That point it could take "THE" book to decipher. Here's a term that wor
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00103.html (16,402 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:45:01 -0500
I just know there's sumthin cryptic in there. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00104.html (17,953 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7 (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick A. Thompson Sr." <wa4tuk-rf@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:05:30 -0500
Sorry, but this stuff is just so much slang. I've also been a ham since '64 and I've been keeping broadcast transmitters on-air since '74 and I've never heard or seen the phrase 3 by 3 or 4 by 5 used
/archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00106.html (10,185 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu