Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+shield\s+an\s+RF\s+deck\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+shield\s+an\s+RF\s+deck\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] shield an RF deck ? (score: 1): Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:29:48 -0500; Is there any pressing reason to put sides and top on an RF deck? My current amp runs decent power and I don't get into anything (TV, phone or stereo etc.). I would like to build another amp in a lock; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00700.html (6,724 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] shield an RF deck ? (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:13:44 +0000; If the rack isn't specifically designed for rf purposes, you can't rely on the rf screening properties. Many have fully painted panels, and rely on wired connections for electrical safety only. The r; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00711.html (7,314 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] shield an RF deck ? (score: 1): Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:50:44 -0500; Thanks for the reply Steve, I appreciate your comments. If the rack isn't specifically designed for rf purposes, you can't rely on the rf screening properties. Many have fully painted panels, and rel; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00012.html (7,280 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]