Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+suppressor\s+material\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+suppressor\s+material\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] suppressor material (score: 1): Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:32:58 -0500; Greetings to all, Yes, I agree that there are better materials available for making parasitic suppressors -- stainless steel is just one good example. But, have you ever tried to fabricate a PRACTICA; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00392.html (8,073 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] suppressor material (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:12:51 -0400; (Amps reflector only) There are many alloys of SS with some far more malleable than others. However, not too long ago there was a thread on here that IIRC resulted in the conclusion that these materi; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00393.html (6,756 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] suppressor material (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:14:56 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: A better approach, IMO is to build a circuit that is stable without any parasitic suppressor at all. Tubes that are physically small such as the 8877 lend themselves to this; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00397.html (8,185 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] suppressor material (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:43:50 -0500; Just so there is no confusion here, the suppressor is not designed to work from 1.8 MHz to 30 MHZ. it is designed to suppress or dampen the plate circuit at the most probable parasitic frequency. Usu; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00403.html (8,541 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]