Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+tuned\s+choke\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+tuned\s+choke\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] tuned choke (score: 1): Author: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>; Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:29:10 -0700; Skipp Tuned to resonance with no load, when you need it the most. When current load is increased, the tuned choke's equiv impedance falls to that of inductive reactance alone as the L changes (drops); /archives//html/Amps/2004-03/msg00335.html (7,751 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] tuned choke (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:20:29 -0800; ? Not only that, but a resonant-choke filter can handle rapid fluctuations in load current (as with SSB) , something that neither a swinging-choke filter or an ordinary choke filter can manage. And,; /archives//html/Amps/2004-03/msg00354.html (8,776 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] tuned choke (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:36:35 +0100; This somewhat puzzles me. I would have expected it to be tuned higher in frequency ( although maybe no more than 0.5 to 1 Hz) so that it looked very inductive under no load conditions. As the load in; /archives//html/Amps/2004-04/msg00034.html (6,859 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]