Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+water\s+cooled\s+160m\s+amp\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+water\s+cooled\s+160m\s+amp\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] water cooled 160m amp. (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:16:07 -0800; That is the same efficiency as with a 8877 at that voltage. It will be much better at higher anode voltage. 73 Peter voltages applied ?? I can see gain going up a bit. I can also see more power out.; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00290.html (6,799 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] water cooled 160m amp. (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:39:19 EST; Jim, if you look art the curves for any of these tubes you will notice that the plate voltage swing can't be allowed below four or five hundred volts without excessive grid current (or screen current; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00291.html (8,212 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]