Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+4\s+sq\.\s+AZ\s+and\s+EL\s+gain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+4\s+sq\.\s+AZ\s+and\s+EL\s+gain\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] 4 sq. AZ and EL gain (score: 1): Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:35:03 +0100; Hello Folks, I am trying to make some meaningful RDF comparisons with Vertical arrays, K9AY arrays and 4 sq. Vertical arrays. I appear to have an anomaly with the 4 sq. i.e. If I look at the max. EL; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-07/msg00000.html (6,493 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] 4 sq. AZ and EL gain (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:43:06 -0700; Is it possible you are looking at the elevation pattern at 45 degrees off of boresight? Say at 0 or 90 degrees azimuth? The models that come with EZNEC at oriented with line of the elements parallel; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-07/msg00001.html (7,911 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] 4 sq. AZ and EL gain (score: 1): Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:05:37 +0100; Terry and Guy, Thanks for the replies. I am using EZNEC+. The gain difference is as Terry commented; I hadn't set the Az angle to 45 degrees for the El plot. It makes sense now. 73 Andrew -- Original; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-07/msg00002.html (9,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]