Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+40\-2CD\s+and\s+XM510\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+40\-2CD\s+and\s+XM510\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] 40-2CD and XM510 (score: 1): Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>; Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:48:59 -0300; Hello again, assuming there´s no problem with this 2 antennas in the same mast 8-10 ft apart, will antenna must be on the top?? Thanks in advance!.. 73, Jorge CX6VM No virus found in this outgo; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-08/msg00000.html (6,140 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] 40-2CD and XM510 (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:12:17 -0400; There is no "must be". While the 40m will probably benefit more from being on top, the weight of the antennas and the material your mast is made of may determine which antenna goes high. 73, Guy, K2A; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-08/msg00001.html (7,544 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] 40-2CD and XM510 (score: 1): Author: "Joe-aa4nn" <aa4nn@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:21:32 -0400; Low band antennas go at the top of the mast. de Joe, aa4nn Hello again, assuming there´s no problem with this 2 antennas in the same mast 8-10 ft apart, will antenna must be on the top?? Thanks; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-08/msg00002.html (7,573 bytes)
4. Re: [Antennaware] 40-2CD and XM510 (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:30:56 -0400; If the low band antenna is heavy enough or has high enough wind load so that the mast is not rated to carry it at the top, one would put it at the bottom to keep from destroying the mast. Otherwise i; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-08/msg00003.html (8,904 bytes)
5. Re: [Antennaware] 40-2CD and XM510 (score: 1): Author: "Ken Kinyon" <w7ts@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:50:35 -0600; You guys are missing one very important factor. It looks a lot cooler to have the smaller antennas on the top. What it looks like if you place the low band antennas on top, is when it was a fad to ha; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-08/msg00004.html (9,440 bytes)
6. Re: [Antennaware] 40-2CD and XM510 (score: 1): Author: <DLance@SummitRacing.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:43:06 -0400; I put my 402cd at the bottom of the mast for two reasons. 1. To reduce strain on the mast, rotator and thrust bearing. 2. Since ithe 402cd has a boom support truss that is mounted above on the mast a; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-08/msg00006.html (7,436 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]