Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Electrons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Electrons\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: bumerang boom <bumerang.boom@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:53:02 -0800 (PST); Hello :) This question is nagging me for a while now but I did not find yet an acceptable answer: Q: Where are the radiated electrons come from? Is a PhD in Physics in the house? BB Without Wax _____; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00012.html (6,633 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Kangas" <stephen@kangas.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:27:00 -0800; No sure what you mean by "radiated" electrons. An antenna does not emit or radiate electrons. The electrons are flowing inside the conductive materials of the antenna (eg, elements, balun/unun, tranm; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00013.html (8,113 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:25:16 -0500; The often quoted rule: Movement of charge creates electromagnetic radiation. If you move an electron from here to there it leaves three dimensional "ripples", not entirely unlike the two dimensional; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00014.html (8,331 bytes)
4. Re: [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Kangas" <stephen@kangas.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:14:50 -0800; Guy has a good analogy. BB: the "field" consists entirely of energy; there is no mass (weight resulting from gravity) to a field. The field does contain "ripples" as Guy says, with characteristics of; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00015.html (12,539 bytes)
5. Re: [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: Andy Wade <andy@ajwade.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:46:00 +0000; Surely it's the *acceleration* of charge that causes E-M radiation. Movement of charge carriers at constant velocity - steady DC - will only set up a constant magnetic (near) field. 73 de G4AJW _____; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00016.html (7,170 bytes)
6. Re: [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: "Andy" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:21:03 -0500; This might be misleading to some, so I thought I'd clarify, on what is my understanding about this. About that "pure energy" ... There is no energy radiating from an electron at rest. But there is a; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00017.html (8,148 bytes)
7. [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Berry" <dennisberry@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:37:47 -0500; There have really been some great answers in this thread. Heck, and I just thought the stork brought them... dennis, nu8s _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing list Ante; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00018.html (6,986 bytes)
8. Re: [Antennaware] Electrons (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:58:58 -0500; Getting into the calculus level of explaining radiation at this point. Also at the point where ordinary conversational meanings of words diverge from "specialty" meanings, and technical conversations; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00019.html (10,635 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]