Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Height\s+for\s+horizontal\s+loops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Height\s+for\s+horizontal\s+loops\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT); How high does a horizontal loop (the look skywire) need to be for decent performance? A quick google search revealed that people were running them at 25 or 30 feet with good results (in their opinion; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00039.html (6,755 bytes)
2. [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:20:06 +0000 (UTC); Hi John, Of course, higher seems to be better, and bigger also seems to be better to some extent. This might be sensory overload, but it does demonstrate what loop size and height can do to/for the; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00043.html (10,211 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Ross Primrose - N4RP <n4rp@aiko.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:25:30 +0000; I run a 160m horizontal loop (543') at about 40'. I also run exclusively QRP. I've exceeded 1000Mile/watt on 80m, 40m, 20m, and 15m with the loop, and worked all continents on SSB & Digital on 5W. Al; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00044.html (8,405 bytes)
4. Re: [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Michael Saulsbury <mri22@hei.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:39:22 -0700; John: To determine operating height you need to know: what the intended operating frequency range, the size of the loop and the operational area you wish to communicate with. Also if you will be oper; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00045.html (9,703 bytes)
5. Re: [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:01:06 -0700; Thanks for the modeling data, Paul. Not surprisingly, the horizontal loop (1 wl circumference) has to be higher than a dipole to give equal or greater gain at angles 50 degrees or less (since the loo; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00049.html (11,099 bytes)
6. Re: [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:12:17 -0600; As can be seen by the fine data supplied, a horizontal loop and a horizontal dipole have about the same take-off-angle. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing l; /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00050.html (12,541 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]