- 1. Re: [Antennaware] New K9AY Observations (score: 1)
- Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:58:24 -0500
- Comments interspersed... That's a good start. Things are not a total mess! Coupling to "something" is the strongest possibility. It can be the radials as well as the radiator of the Inv-L. I would re
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00097.html (8,127 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Antennaware] New K9AY Observations (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:19:25 -0400
- I would also suspect re-radiation from the inverted L - particularly since directivity falls apart as the frequency moves closer to the "resonant" frequency of the inverted L. The vertical wire on t
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00098.html (9,285 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Antennaware] New K9AY Observations (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:29:37 -0400
- In my experience the choke at the loop end of the feedline (before the transformer) is essential - the signal levels coming from the loop are so low that it doesn't take much shield pickup to fill in
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00099.html (10,623 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu