Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Trapped\s+dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Trapped\s+dipoles\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] Trapped dipoles (score: 1): Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:19:36 +0000; I thought that a conventional 80m/40m trap dipole had the trap resonant at 40m, I have now read a number of different fragments of information that say that this is not the best approach and that the; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-11/msg00000.html (7,117 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] Trapped dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:53:09 -0500; The intent was to reduce the amount of circulating current in the trap at the operating frequencies. However, this also changes the placement of the trap, the trap component values and the wire lengt; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-11/msg00001.html (8,166 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]